(11-17-2016, 06:18 PM)orygunluvr Wrote:

(11-17-2016, 01:02 PM)tvguy Wrote:

(11-17-2016, 12:30 AM)capitalist pig Wrote:

(11-17-2016, 12:07 AM)tvguy Wrote:

(11-16-2016, 11:19 PM)capitalist pig Wrote: Spot on!! All those crazy uneducated voters that voted for Trump because of a "picture" and I thought it had something to do with the crooked Clinton machine (see wiki leaks) and the Obama legacy.  ( he made that clear on the campaign trail for Hillary that his legacy was in jeopardy if Trump were elected)  silly me..  you nailed it.  Definitely " pictures"   I think you're onto something here, ever considered contacting the Dnc? They could use someone of you're brilliance.

Sent from my SM-G920R4 using Tapatalk

Do you really have to exaggerate and put words in my mouth. 

All those crazy uneducated voters that voted for Trump because of a "picture"


A PICTURE ??? How about tens of millions of pictures and stories full of lies. If you don't think social media could have had an affect you are fool.

Anyway I'm wasting my time trying have any type on conversation with you.

You are only here to Gloat like a few other far righties who just recently showed up.

I didn't see a single gloat in my response to you're "picture" theory.  Did you?  Makes sense to me now as you appear to see things that others don't see because there not there,  but only you see...  did you feed you're pet unicorn tonight?

Sent from my SM-G920R4 using Tapatalk

Do I need to go look and see how often you have posted AFTER Trump won?

As far as all of your other comments it seems you are like so many other rabid right wingers. That you car barely compose a sentence if there's not an insult included.

You and Your "Clinton machine" and wiki leaks, I bet there is not one single Clinton BS story that you don't believe.... It's obvious you've never had an original thought in your life.

Julian Assange has never, in all his years of hacking, had to retract one thing. I bet you were cool when he did the same thing to the bush administration, because you puppet masters sure were. It wasn't bullshit then according to them.

(11-17-2016, 06:18 PM)orygunluvr Wrote:

(11-17-2016, 01:02 PM)tvguy Wrote:

(11-17-2016, 12:30 AM)capitalist pig Wrote:

(11-17-2016, 12:07 AM)tvguy Wrote:

(11-16-2016, 11:19 PM)capitalist pig Wrote: Spot on!! All those crazy uneducated voters that voted for Trump because of a "picture" and I thought it had something to do with the crooked Clinton machine (see wiki leaks) and the Obama legacy.  ( he made that clear on the campaign trail for Hillary that his legacy was in jeopardy if Trump were elected)  silly me..  you nailed it.  Definitely " pictures"   I think you're onto something here, ever considered contacting the Dnc? They could use someone of you're brilliance.

Sent from my SM-G920R4 using Tapatalk

Do you really have to exaggerate and put words in my mouth. 

All those crazy uneducated voters that voted for Trump because of a "picture"


A PICTURE ??? How about tens of millions of pictures and stories full of lies. If you don't think social media could have had an affect you are fool.

Anyway I'm wasting my time trying have any type on conversation with you.

You are only here to Gloat like a few other far righties who just recently showed up.

I didn't see a single gloat in my response to you're "picture" theory.  Did you?  Makes sense to me now as you appear to see things that others don't see because there not there,  but only you see...  did you feed you're pet unicorn tonight?

Sent from my SM-G920R4 using Tapatalk

Do I need to go look and see how often you have posted AFTER Trump won?

As far as all of your other comments it seems you are like so many other rabid right wingers. That you car barely compose a sentence if there's not an insult included.

You and Your "Clinton machine" and wiki leaks, I bet there is not one single Clinton BS story that you don't believe.... It's obvious you've never had an original thought in your life.

Julian Assange has never, in all his years of hacking, had to retract one thing. I bet you were cool when he did the same thing to the bush administration, because you puppet masters sure were. It wasn't bullshit then according to them.

(11-17-2016, 07:11 PM)Cuzz Wrote:

(11-17-2016, 06:18 PM)orygunluvr Wrote:

(11-17-2016, 01:02 PM)tvguy Wrote:

(11-17-2016, 12:30 AM)capitalist pig Wrote:

(11-17-2016, 12:07 AM)tvguy Wrote: Do you really have to exaggerate and put words in my mouth. 

All those crazy uneducated voters that voted for Trump because of a "picture"


A PICTURE ??? How about tens of millions of pictures and stories full of lies. If you don't think social media could have had an affect you are fool.

Anyway I'm wasting my time trying have any type on conversation with you.

You are only here to Gloat like a few other far righties who just recently showed up.

I didn't see a single gloat in my response to you're "picture" theory.  Did you?  Makes sense to me now as you appear to see things that others don't see because there not there,  but only you see...  did you feed you're pet unicorn tonight?

Sent from my SM-G920R4 using Tapatalk

Do I need to go look and see how often you have posted AFTER Trump won?

As far as all of your other comments it seems you are like so many other rabid right wingers. That you car barely compose a sentence if there's not an insult included.

You and Your "Clinton machine" and wiki leaks, I bet there is not one single Clinton BS story that you don't believe.... It's obvious you've never had an original thought in your life.

Julian Assange has never, in all his years of hacking, had to retract one thing. I bet you were cool when he did the same thing to the bush administration, because you puppet masters sure were. It wasn't bullshit then according to them.

I didn't think Assange actually did any hacking anymore. He seems to be a publisher of other peoples hacking results. If that's true I wonder who you think supplied the DNC emails?

(11-17-2016, 07:22 PM)capitalist pig Wrote:

(11-17-2016, 07:11 PM)Cuzz Wrote:

(11-17-2016, 06:18 PM)orygunluvr Wrote:

(11-17-2016, 01:02 PM)tvguy Wrote:

(11-17-2016, 12:30 AM)capitalist pig Wrote: I didn't see a single gloat in my response to you're "picture" theory.  Did you?  Makes sense to me now as you appear to see things that others don't see because there not there,  but only you see...  did you feed you're pet unicorn tonight?

Sent from my SM-G920R4 using Tapatalk

Do I need to go look and see how often you have posted AFTER Trump won?

As far as all of your other comments it seems you are like so many other rabid right wingers. That you car barely compose a sentence if there's not an insult included.

You and Your "Clinton machine" and wiki leaks, I bet there is not one single Clinton BS story that you don't believe.... It's obvious you've never had an original thought in your life.

Julian Assange has never, in all his years of hacking, had to retract one thing. I bet you were cool when he did the same thing to the bush administration, because you puppet masters sure were. It wasn't bullshit then according to them.

I didn't think Assange actually did any hacking anymore. He seems to be a publisher of other peoples hacking results. If that's true I wonder who you think supplied the DNC emails?

Lol what does that matter, lol strawman argument.   Lol  two totally separate issues. Does it change anything if they came from Russia , China, Canada,  dnc, rnc,fbi,Cia, nsa, etc etc etc. ( insert guess of choice)  now are you that foolish to argue this point?  But!! Now that we know they have been hacked it shows the huge problems of Hillary private server and now we have a whole new problem, who hacked, what was hacked, and why was hillary so stupid, or was she not so stupid knowing they had to be hidden to cover the criminal Clinton machine.  The left is beginning to call for a pardon, why would one need a pardon if she did no wrong??  Cheers

Sent from my SM-G920R4 using Tapatalk

(11-17-2016, 07:35 PM)Cuzz Wrote:

(11-17-2016, 07:22 PM)capitalist pig Wrote:

(11-17-2016, 07:11 PM)Cuzz Wrote:

(11-17-2016, 06:18 PM)orygunluvr Wrote:

(11-17-2016, 01:02 PM)tvguy Wrote: Do I need to go look and see how often you have posted AFTER Trump won?

As far as all of your other comments it seems you are like so many other rabid right wingers. That you car barely compose a sentence if there's not an insult included.

You and Your "Clinton machine" and wiki leaks, I bet there is not one single Clinton BS story that you don't believe.... It's obvious you've never had an original thought in your life.

Julian Assange has never, in all his years of hacking, had to retract one thing. I bet you were cool when he did the same thing to the bush administration, because you puppet masters sure were. It wasn't bullshit then according to them.

I didn't think Assange actually did any hacking anymore. He seems to be a publisher of other peoples hacking results. If that's true I wonder who you think supplied the DNC emails?

Lol what does that matter, lol strawman argument.   Lol  two totally separate issues. Does it change anything if they came from Russia , China, Canada,  dnc, rnc,fbi,Cia, nsa, etc etc etc. ( insert guess of choice)  now are you that foolish to argue this point?  But!! Now that we know they have been hacked it shows the huge problems of Hillary private server and now we have a whole new problem, who hacked, what was hacked, and why was hillary so stupid, or was she not so stupid knowing they had to be hidden to cover the criminal Clinton machine.  The left is beginning to call for a pardon, why would one need a pardon if she did no wrong??  Cheers

Sent from my SM-G920R4 using Tapatalk

I would say it does matter a great deal IF a foreign country, any foreign country, manipulated our election. That's a serious thing even if you don't think so.

I didn't argue anything in my previous post so you must be seeing things. I asked a question. I'll ask again. Who do YOU think actually supplied the data to WikiLeaks? I'm curious.

(11-17-2016, 07:37 PM)orygunluvr Wrote:

(11-17-2016, 07:35 PM)Cuzz Wrote:

(11-17-2016, 07:22 PM)capitalist pig Wrote:

(11-17-2016, 07:11 PM)Cuzz Wrote:

(11-17-2016, 06:18 PM)orygunluvr Wrote: Julian Assange has never, in all his years of hacking, had to retract one thing. I bet you were cool when he did the same thing to the bush administration, because you puppet masters sure were. It wasn't bullshit then according to them.

I didn't think Assange actually did any hacking anymore. He seems to be a publisher of other peoples hacking results. If that's true I wonder who you think supplied the DNC emails?

Lol what does that matter, lol strawman argument.   Lol  two totally separate issues. Does it change anything if they came from Russia , China, Canada,  dnc, rnc,fbi,Cia, nsa, etc etc etc. ( insert guess of choice)  now are you that foolish to argue this point?  But!! Now that we know they have been hacked it shows the huge problems of Hillary private server and now we have a whole new problem, who hacked, what was hacked, and why was hillary so stupid, or was she not so stupid knowing they had to be hidden to cover the criminal Clinton machine.  The left is beginning to call for a pardon, why would one need a pardon if she did no wrong??  Cheers

Sent from my SM-G920R4 using Tapatalk

I would say it does matter a great deal IF a foreign country, any foreign country, manipulated our election. That's a serious thing even if you don't think so.

I didn't argue anything in my previous post so you must be seeing things. I asked a question. I'll ask again. Who do YOU think actually supplied the data to WikiLeaks? I'm curious.

The guy hacked federal computers starting when he was sixteen.

(11-17-2016, 07:35 PM)Cuzz Wrote:

(11-17-2016, 07:22 PM)capitalist pig Wrote:

(11-17-2016, 07:11 PM)Cuzz Wrote:

(11-17-2016, 06:18 PM)orygunluvr Wrote:

(11-17-2016, 01:02 PM)tvguy Wrote: Do I need to go look and see how often you have posted AFTER Trump won?

As far as all of your other comments it seems you are like so many other rabid right wingers. That you car barely compose a sentence if there's not an insult included.

You and Your "Clinton machine" and wiki leaks, I bet there is not one single Clinton BS story that you don't believe.... It's obvious you've never had an original thought in your life.

Julian Assange has never, in all his years of hacking, had to retract one thing. I bet you were cool when he did the same thing to the bush administration, because you puppet masters sure were. It wasn't bullshit then according to them.

I didn't think Assange actually did any hacking anymore. He seems to be a publisher of other peoples hacking results. If that's true I wonder who you think supplied the DNC emails?

Lol what does that matter, lol strawman argument.   Lol  two totally separate issues. Does it change anything if they came from Russia , China, Canada,  dnc, rnc,fbi,Cia, nsa, etc etc etc. ( insert guess of choice)  now are you that foolish to argue this point?  But!! Now that we know they have been hacked it shows the huge problems of Hillary private server and now we have a whole new problem, who hacked, what was hacked, and why was hillary so stupid, or was she not so stupid knowing they had to be hidden to cover the criminal Clinton machine.  The left is beginning to call for a pardon, why would one need a pardon if she did no wrong??  Cheers

Sent from my SM-G920R4 using Tapatalk

I would say it does matter a great deal IF a foreign country, any foreign country, manipulated our election. That's a serious thing even if you don't think so.

I didn't argue anything in my previous post so you must be seeing things. I asked a question. I'll ask again. Who do YOU think actually supplied the data to WikiLeaks? I'm curious.

(11-17-2016, 07:35 PM)Cuzz Wrote:

(11-17-2016, 07:22 PM)capitalist pig Wrote:

(11-17-2016, 07:11 PM)Cuzz Wrote:

(11-17-2016, 06:18 PM)orygunluvr Wrote:

(11-17-2016, 01:02 PM)tvguy Wrote: Do I need to go look and see how often you have posted AFTER Trump won?

As far as all of your other comments it seems you are like so many other rabid right wingers. That you car barely compose a sentence if there's not an insult included.

You and Your "Clinton machine" and wiki leaks, I bet there is not one single Clinton BS story that you don't believe.... It's obvious you've never had an original thought in your life.

Julian Assange has never, in all his years of hacking, had to retract one thing. I bet you were cool when he did the same thing to the bush administration, because you puppet masters sure were. It wasn't bullshit then according to them.

I didn't think Assange actually did any hacking anymore. He seems to be a publisher of other peoples hacking results. If that's true I wonder who you think supplied the DNC emails?

Lol what does that matter, lol strawman argument.   Lol  two totally separate issues. Does it change anything if they came from Russia , China, Canada,  dnc, rnc,fbi,Cia, nsa, etc etc etc. ( insert guess of choice)  now are you that foolish to argue this point?  But!! Now that we know they have been hacked it shows the huge problems of Hillary private server and now we have a whole new problem, who hacked, what was hacked, and why was hillary so stupid, or was she not so stupid knowing they had to be hidden to cover the criminal Clinton machine.  The left is beginning to call for a pardon, why would one need a pardon if she did no wrong??  Cheers

Sent from my SM-G920R4 using Tapatalk

I would say it does matter a great deal IF a foreign country, any foreign country, manipulated our election. That's a serious thing even if you don't think so.

I didn't argue anything in my previous post so you must be seeing things. I asked a question. I'll ask again. Who do YOU think actually supplied the data to WikiLeaks? I'm curious.

(11-17-2016, 08:04 PM)capitalist pig Wrote:

(11-17-2016, 07:35 PM)Cuzz Wrote:

(11-17-2016, 07:22 PM)capitalist pig Wrote:

(11-17-2016, 07:11 PM)Cuzz Wrote:

(11-17-2016, 06:18 PM)orygunluvr Wrote: Julian Assange has never, in all his years of hacking, had to retract one thing. I bet you were cool when he did the same thing to the bush administration, because you puppet masters sure were. It wasn't bullshit then according to them.

I didn't think Assange actually did any hacking anymore. He seems to be a publisher of other peoples hacking results. If that's true I wonder who you think supplied the DNC emails?

Lol what does that matter, lol strawman argument.   Lol  two totally separate issues. Does it change anything if they came from Russia , China, Canada,  dnc, rnc,fbi,Cia, nsa, etc etc etc. ( insert guess of choice)  now are you that foolish to argue this point?  But!! Now that we know they have been hacked it shows the huge problems of Hillary private server and now we have a whole new problem, who hacked, what was hacked, and why was hillary so stupid, or was she not so stupid knowing they had to be hidden to cover the criminal Clinton machine.  The left is beginning to call for a pardon, why would one need a pardon if she did no wrong??  Cheers

Sent from my SM-G920R4 using Tapatalk

I would say it does matter a great deal IF a foreign country, any foreign country, manipulated our election. That's a serious thing even if you don't think so.

I didn't argue anything in my previous post so you must be seeing things. I asked a question. I'll ask again. Who do YOU think actually supplied the data to WikiLeaks? I'm curious.

I forgot to answer on who I think did.  I honestly don't know, Russia was floated by the hillary campaign, may be correct, but I take with a grain of salt as everything is political on both sides,  I read maybe someone from Washington and a inside job. Could be any reason for that, axe to grind against hillary?  Angry hillary problem was being swept under the table by the current administrative  ( bill and Lynch meeting on the plane)  someone wanting the truth out for no reason other then wanting the truth told. Who knows at this point..... a election can not be manipulated by the truth,  the truth is always supposed to be on the table. These emails were hers!!!  

Sent from my SM-G920R4 using Tapatalk

(11-17-2016, 08:23 PM)Cuzz Wrote:

(11-17-2016, 08:04 PM)capitalist pig Wrote:

(11-17-2016, 07:35 PM)Cuzz Wrote:

(11-17-2016, 07:22 PM)capitalist pig Wrote:

(11-17-2016, 07:11 PM)Cuzz Wrote: I didn't think Assange actually did any hacking anymore. He seems to be a publisher of other peoples hacking results. If that's true I wonder who you think supplied the DNC emails?

Lol what does that matter, lol strawman argument.   Lol  two totally separate issues. Does it change anything if they came from Russia , China, Canada,  dnc, rnc,fbi,Cia, nsa, etc etc etc. ( insert guess of choice)  now are you that foolish to argue this point?  But!! Now that we know they have been hacked it shows the huge problems of Hillary private server and now we have a whole new problem, who hacked, what was hacked, and why was hillary so stupid, or was she not so stupid knowing they had to be hidden to cover the criminal Clinton machine.  The left is beginning to call for a pardon, why would one need a pardon if she did no wrong??  Cheers

Sent from my SM-G920R4 using Tapatalk

I would say it does matter a great deal IF a foreign country, any foreign country, manipulated our election. That's a serious thing even if you don't think so.

I didn't argue anything in my previous post so you must be seeing things. I asked a question. I'll ask again. Who do YOU think actually supplied the data to WikiLeaks? I'm curious.

I forgot to answer on who I think did.  I honestly don't know, Russia was floated by the hillary campaign, may be correct, but I take with a grain of salt as everything is political on both sides,  I read maybe someone from Washington and a inside job. Could be any reason for that, axe to grind against hillary?  Angry hillary problem was being swept under the table by the current administrative  ( bill and Lynch meeting on the plane)  someone wanting the truth out for no reason other then wanting the truth told. Who knows at this point..... a election can not be manipulated by the truth,  the truth is always supposed to be on the table. These emails were hers!!!  

Sent from my SM-G920R4 using Tapatalk

Ah, but how do we know it's the truth? I'm not talking now about this election. I'm thinking about election manipulation by foreign agents manipulating information and releasing it through someone like WikiLeaks. WikiLeaks, as far as I know, doesn't vet anything they just publish it and let the chips fall were they may. Does that scenario concern you for future elections?

(11-17-2016, 08:40 PM)capitalist pig Wrote:

(11-17-2016, 08:23 PM)Cuzz Wrote:

(11-17-2016, 08:04 PM)capitalist pig Wrote:

(11-17-2016, 07:35 PM)Cuzz Wrote:

(11-17-2016, 07:22 PM)capitalist pig Wrote: Lol what does that matter, lol strawman argument.   Lol  two totally separate issues. Does it change anything if they came from Russia , China, Canada,  dnc, rnc,fbi,Cia, nsa, etc etc etc. ( insert guess of choice)  now are you that foolish to argue this point?  But!! Now that we know they have been hacked it shows the huge problems of Hillary private server and now we have a whole new problem, who hacked, what was hacked, and why was hillary so stupid, or was she not so stupid knowing they had to be hidden to cover the criminal Clinton machine.  The left is beginning to call for a pardon, why would one need a pardon if she did no wrong??  Cheers

Sent from my SM-G920R4 using Tapatalk

I would say it does matter a great deal IF a foreign country, any foreign country, manipulated our election. That's a serious thing even if you don't think so.

I didn't argue anything in my previous post so you must be seeing things. I asked a question. I'll ask again. Who do YOU think actually supplied the data to WikiLeaks? I'm curious.

I forgot to answer on who I think did.  I honestly don't know, Russia was floated by the hillary campaign, may be correct, but I take with a grain of salt as everything is political on both sides,  I read maybe someone from Washington and a inside job. Could be any reason for that, axe to grind against hillary?  Angry hillary problem was being swept under the table by the current administrative  ( bill and Lynch meeting on the plane)  someone wanting the truth out for no reason other then wanting the truth told. Who knows at this point..... a election can not be manipulated by the truth,  the truth is always supposed to be on the table. These emails were hers!!!  

Sent from my SM-G920R4 using Tapatalk

Ah, but how do we know it's the truth? I'm not talking now about this election. I'm thinking about election manipulation by foreign agents manipulating information and releasing it through someone like WikiLeaks. WikiLeaks, as far as I know, doesn't vet anything they just publish it and let the chips fall were they may. Does that scenario concern you for future elections?

Very much so, I would add what about our own government,  the power of the party in charge to use the surveillance power of our country against the other party. An example  (not necessarily surveillance)  Watergate, Lerner and the IRS, we could add others from both parties.  I fear all the info being collected by our government in the name of our safety may prove to not be so good.

Sent from my SM-G920R4 using Tapatalk

(11-17-2016, 09:02 PM)Cuzz Wrote:

(11-17-2016, 08:40 PM)capitalist pig Wrote:

(11-17-2016, 08:23 PM)Cuzz Wrote:

(11-17-2016, 08:04 PM)capitalist pig Wrote:

(11-17-2016, 07:35 PM)Cuzz Wrote: I would say it does matter a great deal IF a foreign country, any foreign country, manipulated our election. That's a serious thing even if you don't think so.

I didn't argue anything in my previous post so you must be seeing things. I asked a question. I'll ask again. Who do YOU think actually supplied the data to WikiLeaks? I'm curious.

I forgot to answer on who I think did.  I honestly don't know, Russia was floated by the hillary campaign, may be correct, but I take with a grain of salt as everything is political on both sides,  I read maybe someone from Washington and a inside job. Could be any reason for that, axe to grind against hillary?  Angry hillary problem was being swept under the table by the current administrative  ( bill and Lynch meeting on the plane)  someone wanting the truth out for no reason other then wanting the truth told. Who knows at this point..... a election can not be manipulated by the truth,  the truth is always supposed to be on the table. These emails were hers!!!  

Sent from my SM-G920R4 using Tapatalk

Ah, but how do we know it's the truth? I'm not talking now about this election. I'm thinking about election manipulation by foreign agents manipulating information and releasing it through someone like WikiLeaks. WikiLeaks, as far as I know, doesn't vet anything they just publish it and let the chips fall were they may. Does that scenario concern you for future elections?

Very much so, I would add what about our own government,  the power of the party in charge to use the surveillance power of our country against the other party. An example  (not necessarily surveillance)  Watergate, Lerner and the IRS, we could add others from both parties.  I fear all the info being collected by our government in the name of our safety may prove to not be so good.

Sent from my SM-G920R4 using Tapatalk

Well, details aside, I think we can agree on this at least.

(11-18-2016, 10:23 AM)Hugo Wrote: Bunch of whiny fucks.

(11-18-2016, 10:28 AM)Valuesize Wrote:

(11-18-2016, 10:23 AM)Hugo Wrote: Bunch of whiny fucks.

But we weren't duped.

(11-18-2016, 03:32 PM)SFLiberal Wrote:

(11-18-2016, 10:28 AM)Valuesize Wrote:

(11-18-2016, 10:23 AM)Hugo Wrote: Bunch of whiny fucks.

But we weren't duped.

You lost

(11-18-2016, 03:39 PM)Valuesize Wrote:

(11-18-2016, 03:32 PM)SFLiberal Wrote:

(11-18-2016, 10:28 AM)Valuesize Wrote:

(11-18-2016, 10:23 AM)Hugo Wrote: Bunch of whiny fucks.

But we weren't duped.

You lost

We ALL lost.

(11-18-2016, 03:39 PM)Valuesize Wrote:

(11-18-2016, 03:32 PM)SFLiberal Wrote:

(11-18-2016, 10:28 AM)Valuesize Wrote:

(11-18-2016, 10:23 AM)Hugo Wrote: Bunch of whiny fucks.

But we weren't duped.

You lost

We ALL lost.