Posts: 11,336
Threads: 346
Joined: Mar 2009
This is an interesting article that might help someone you know. This reads like some stuff that the epilepsy foundation has written as well. Chuck could learn a few things for this as well.
http://www.truthonpot.com/2013/07/01/med...the-facts/
Medical Marijuana and Epilepsy
Posts: 11,336
Threads: 346
Joined: Mar 2009
So in the past 2 weeks the dea and fda won't reschedule marijuana, and the 9th circuit court of appeals says it won't let federal courts prosecute legitimate medical marijuana growers and users. That doesn't mean you still can't be raided and lose everything in asset forfeiture, you just won't get prosecuted at the federal level.
Posts: 11,336
Threads: 346
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 18,101
Threads: 859
Joined: Feb 2009
(08-27-2016, 02:47 PM)orygunluvr Wrote: So in the past 2 weeks the dea and fda won't reschedule marijuana, and the 9th circuit court of appeals says it won't let federal courts prosecute legitimate medical marijuana growers and users. That doesn't mean you still can't be raided and lose everything in asset forfeiture, you just won't get prosecuted at the federal level.
The link is to the Applegater Newspaper. This issue has a very pro marijuana article if you care to read it.
http://www.ifoldsflip.com/i/718872-apple...all-2016/0?
Posts: 18,101
Threads: 859
Joined: Feb 2009
Here is another article about the requirement keep marijuana gardens out of public view. It is a interesting look at a new industry and the Prohibitionist views that linger.
http://www.applegater.org/pdf/2016/v09n03/v09n03p21.pdf
Posts: 5,465
Threads: 36
Joined: Feb 2009
Thank you GOP for schedule 1 classification, oh and knowingly spraying paraquat to make Americans sick. Old loves die hard.
Posts: 41,857
Threads: 560
Joined: Mar 2009
(08-30-2016, 07:54 AM)cletus1 Wrote: Here is another article about the requirement keep marijuana gardens out of public view. It is a interesting look at a new industry and the Prohibitionist views that linger.
http://www.applegater.org/pdf/2016/v09n03/v09n03p21.pdf
The worst part about the requirement to keep marijuana gardens out of public view. Is the fact that so many people put up ugly ass barriers with cloth mesh hanging all over that looks like some third world shit hole.
Posts: 14,339
Threads: 709
Joined: Jan 2011
08-31-2016, 12:48 PM
(This post was last modified: 08-31-2016, 12:49 PM by Valuesize. Edited 2 times in total.)
(08-31-2016, 12:12 PM)tvguy Wrote: (08-30-2016, 07:54 AM)cletus1 Wrote: Here is another article about the requirement keep marijuana gardens out of public view. It is a interesting look at a new industry and the Prohibitionist views that linger.
http://www.applegater.org/pdf/2016/v09n03/v09n03p21.pdf
The worst part about the requirement to keep marijuana gardens out of public view. Is the fact that so many people put up ugly ass barriers with cloth mesh hanging all over that looks like some third world shit hole.
I've always thought they were cool looking plants. Maybe people should plant them decoratively like they do sunflowers.
Posts: 41,857
Threads: 560
Joined: Mar 2009
(08-31-2016, 12:48 PM)Valuesize Wrote: (08-31-2016, 12:12 PM)tvguy Wrote: (08-30-2016, 07:54 AM)cletus1 Wrote: Here is another article about the requirement keep marijuana gardens out of public view. It is a interesting look at a new industry and the Prohibitionist views that linger.
http://www.applegater.org/pdf/2016/v09n03/v09n03p21.pdf
The worst part about the requirement to keep marijuana gardens out of public view. Is the fact that so many people put up ugly ass barriers with cloth mesh hanging all over that looks like some third world shit hole.
I've always thought they were cool looking plants. Maybe people should plant them decoratively like they do sunflowers. Except there's no law that says you have to hide your sunflowers.
But yeah I always thought they were cool plants also.
Posts: 4,926
Threads: 34
Joined: Nov 2013
(08-31-2016, 01:02 PM)tvguy Wrote: (08-31-2016, 12:48 PM)Valuesize Wrote: (08-31-2016, 12:12 PM)tvguy Wrote: (08-30-2016, 07:54 AM)cletus1 Wrote: Here is another article about the requirement keep marijuana gardens out of public view. It is a interesting look at a new industry and the Prohibitionist views that linger.
http://www.applegater.org/pdf/2016/v09n03/v09n03p21.pdf
The worst part about the requirement to keep marijuana gardens out of public view. Is the fact that so many people put up ugly ass barriers with cloth mesh hanging all over that looks like some third world shit hole.
I've always thought they were cool looking plants. Maybe people should plant them decoratively like they do sunflowers. Except there's no law that says you have to hide your sunflowers.
But yeah I always thought they were cool plants also.
Those barriers do make it easier to spot the grows from a distance.
Posts: 11,336
Threads: 346
Joined: Mar 2009
(08-30-2016, 02:59 PM)Willie Krash Wrote: Thank you GOP for schedule 1 classification, oh and knowingly spraying paraquat to make Americans sick. Old loves die hard.
A demokkkratikkk majority in both house and senate when the controlled substance act was written and signed is hardly the gop.
Posts: 18,101
Threads: 859
Joined: Feb 2009
09-01-2016, 12:50 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2016, 12:53 PM by cletus1. Edited 1 time in total.)
(09-01-2016, 08:38 AM)orygunluvr Wrote: (08-30-2016, 02:59 PM)Willie Krash Wrote: Thank you GOP for schedule 1 classification, oh and knowingly spraying paraquat to make Americans sick. Old loves die hard.
A demokkkratikkk majority in both house and senate when the controlled substance act was written and signed is hardly the gop.
It's the DEA that fights to keep it a schedule 1 drug. It doesn't much matter which party had the majority when marijuana was first classified as a schedule 1 narcotic. The bureaucracy of the DEA is self serving. The more substances they can keep illegal, the better it is for that federal agency and to hell with science. The DEA will never go away, but if you want to keep playing the blame game, Nixon established that agency.
Posts: 18,298
Threads: 867
Joined: Mar 2011
(09-01-2016, 12:50 PM)cletus1 Wrote: (09-01-2016, 08:38 AM)orygunluvr Wrote: (08-30-2016, 02:59 PM)Willie Krash Wrote: Thank you GOP for schedule 1 classification, oh and knowingly spraying paraquat to make Americans sick. Old loves die hard.
A demokkkratikkk majority in both house and senate when the controlled substance act was written and signed is hardly the gop.
It's the DEA that fights to keep it a schedule 1 drug. It doesn't much matter which party had the majority when marijuana was first classified as a schedule 1 narcotic. The bureaucracy of the DEA is self serving. The more substances they can keep illegal, the better it is for that federal agency and to hell with science. The DEA will never go away, but if you want to keep playing the blame game, Nixon established that agency.
Follow the money.
Posts: 11,336
Threads: 346
Joined: Mar 2009
(09-01-2016, 09:18 PM)chuck white Wrote: (09-01-2016, 12:50 PM)cletus1 Wrote: (09-01-2016, 08:38 AM)orygunluvr Wrote: (08-30-2016, 02:59 PM)Willie Krash Wrote: Thank you GOP for schedule 1 classification, oh and knowingly spraying paraquat to make Americans sick. Old loves die hard.
A demokkkratikkk majority in both house and senate when the controlled substance act was written and signed is hardly the gop.
It's the DEA that fights to keep it a schedule 1 drug. It doesn't much matter which party had the majority when marijuana was first classified as a schedule 1 narcotic. The bureaucracy of the DEA is self serving. The more substances they can keep illegal, the better it is for that federal agency and to hell with science. The DEA will never go away, but if you want to keep playing the blame game, Nixon established that agency.
Follow the money. Good thing those prison workers have those unions to protect them, and hand out wads of cash to keep pot illegal.
Posts: 11,336
Threads: 346
Joined: Mar 2009
(09-01-2016, 12:50 PM)cletus1 Wrote: (09-01-2016, 08:38 AM)orygunluvr Wrote: (08-30-2016, 02:59 PM)Willie Krash Wrote: Thank you GOP for schedule 1 classification, oh and knowingly spraying paraquat to make Americans sick. Old loves die hard.
A demokkkratikkk majority in both house and senate when the controlled substance act was written and signed is hardly the gop.
It's the DEA that fights to keep it a schedule 1 drug. It doesn't much matter which party had the majority when marijuana was first classified as a schedule 1 narcotic. The bureaucracy of the DEA is self serving. The more substances they can keep illegal, the better it is for that federal agency and to hell with science. The DEA will never go away, but if you want to keep playing the blame game, Nixon established that agency. All he did was merge two different drug enforcement agencies into one.
Posts: 18,101
Threads: 859
Joined: Feb 2009
(09-02-2016, 02:36 PM)orygunluvr Wrote: (09-01-2016, 12:50 PM)cletus1 Wrote: (09-01-2016, 08:38 AM)orygunluvr Wrote: (08-30-2016, 02:59 PM)Willie Krash Wrote: Thank you GOP for schedule 1 classification, oh and knowingly spraying paraquat to make Americans sick. Old loves die hard.
A demokkkratikkk majority in both house and senate when the controlled substance act was written and signed is hardly the gop.
It's the DEA that fights to keep it a schedule 1 drug. It doesn't much matter which party had the majority when marijuana was first classified as a schedule 1 narcotic. The bureaucracy of the DEA is self serving. The more substances they can keep illegal, the better it is for that federal agency and to hell with science. The DEA will never go away, but if you want to keep playing the blame game, Nixon established that agency. All he did was merge two different drug enforcement agencies into one.
That's true and he gave the new agency more money and responsibilities. The DEA now acts like an international law enforcement agency. They meddle in the politics of other countries and push their anti marijuana agenda on every other country. Only wealthy countries can afford to tell them to mind their own business. Poor countries do what the DEA wants or risks losing foreign aid.
|