Climate Change Summed Up
#21
(11-28-2016, 06:31 AM)chuck white Wrote:
(11-27-2016, 10:14 PM)orygunluvr Wrote: We were supposed to be ice free forever like last year wasn't it?

Where do you get that garbage?

Al Gore?
Reply
#22
(11-28-2016, 06:31 AM)chuck white Wrote:
(11-27-2016, 10:14 PM)orygunluvr Wrote: We were supposed to be ice free forever like last year wasn't it?

Where do you get that garbage?

Right from the trash trucks mouth


Reply
#23
(11-28-2016, 08:18 AM)Wonky3 Wrote:
(11-28-2016, 06:31 AM)chuck white Wrote:
(11-27-2016, 10:14 PM)orygunluvr Wrote: We were supposed to be ice free forever like last year wasn't it?

Where do you get that garbage?

Come on Chuck, you MUST know. 
You (or anyone really) can wrap your head in aluminum foil, don goggles with yelllow lens, sit under a tree once struck by lightning, hold a small frog in your left hand and ...."the truth shall be revealed to you".
You rubes wouldn't know the truth if it pissed in your mouth. This has been common knowledge for the rest of the world, but since your handlers like you guys uninformed and complacent you  don't function like the rest of the world.
Reply
#24
Al gore said it could disappear as early as, not as late as.
Not that you could comprehend the difference.
Reply
#25
(11-28-2016, 06:13 PM)chuck white Wrote: Al gore said it could disappear as early as, not as late as.
Not that you could comprehend the difference
Blah blah blah
Reply
#26
Quote:— Scientists surveying the Great Barrier Reef said on Tuesday that it had suffered the worst coral die-off ever recorded after being bathed this year in warm waters that bleached and then weakened the coral.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/29/world/...ching.html
Reply
#27
(11-29-2016, 07:10 AM)chuck white Wrote:
Quote:— Scientists surveying the Great Barrier Reef said on Tuesday that it had suffered the worst coral die-off ever recorded after being bathed this year in warm waters that bleached and then weakened the coral.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/29/world/...ching.html

That's been going on for a long time but not at that level. It's really too bad it's this bad after only one year.
Reply
#28
Quote:A groundbreaking new study suggests that scientists have underestimated the impact of climate change.
The report, which was authored by an international team of researchers, draws upon data from several dozen field experiments conducted over the last two decades.

The biggest finding was that, up until now, scientists had failed to take in to account the fact that organisms in the soil have been producing carbon at an ever-increasing rate.

Global temperatures are now expected to rise by one degree Celsius by the year 2050 due to 55 billion tonnes of additional carbon being released in to the atmosphere over the coming decades.

"It's fair to say we have passed the point of no return on global warming and we can't reverse the effects, but certainly we can dampen them," said study author Dr Thomas Crowther, who has also branded President-elect Donald Trump's skepticism of the topic as 'catastrophic for humanity'.

http://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/new...-no-return
Reply
#29
https://ihavethetruth.com/2017/02/08/gre...-change-2/

Greatest Hoax of the 21st Century! 98% Scientists DO NOT Believe in Man-Made Climate Change!
Scott OsbornFeb 8, 2017
[color=rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.65098)][Image: Unknown-2-660x400.jpeg][/color]
Climate Change activists from Al Gore down have been saying for almost a decade that 98% of the Scientific community believe in man-made climate change.
But what they fail to tell you is that 98% comes from an equation of only 75 out of 77 climate change scientists.
Imagine that! Al Gore lied, and he knows he lied!
The 98% lie comes from a 2009 American Geophysical Union (AGU) survey consisting of an intentionally brief two-minute, two question online survey sent to 10,257 earth scientists by two researchers at the University of Illinois. 
The widely used survey was sent to only 10,000 scientists, 3,000 came back and only 77 peer-reviewed climate scientists participated!
Yet it is the main talking point used by the left to prove the Climate Change Hoax!!
As Larry Bell writes in Forbes:
Then of those [3,146 that actually took the survey], only a small subset, just 77 who had been successful in getting more than half of their papers recently accepted by peer-reviewed climate science journals, were considered in their survey statistic. That “98% all scientists” referred to a laughably puny number of 75 of those 77 who answered “yes”.
Only with Common Core math can you make 75 scientists equal 98% of the entire scientific community!
On the other end, since 1998, more than 31,000 scientists, have announced that “…there is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth’s atmosphere and disruption of the Earth’s climate.”
Recently, one of the founders of GreenPeace, Dr. Patrick Moore, (who has a BS in Biology and a PhD in Ecology, wrote the piece that begins:
[Image: 11083615_10204932220519058_6308864162689...00x279.jpg]That “98% all scientists” referred to a laughably puny number of 75 of those 77 who answered “yes”.”
I am skeptical humans are the main cause of climate change and that it will be catastrophic in the near future. There is no scientific proof of this hypothesis, yet we are told “the debate is over” and “the science is settled.””
Yet, Al Gore says it is settled? Well Al Gore lies!
Al Gore claimed that the seas were going to rise and islands would disappear! There were actually 35 lies in his movie “An Inconvenient Truth.
In fact, in October 2007 the High Court in London had identified nine “errors” in Gore’s movie that were so outrageous that it caused a major upheaval when they wanted to show the movie about climate change in their secondary schools.
The Science and Public Policy Institute issued a detailed report on the 35 lies that the movie told: 35 Inconvenient Truths: The errors in Al Gore’s movie.
Of course with all that money he is making on this hoax, I guess he has to lie at this point:
[color=rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.65098)][Image: article-2415191-185A43E400000578-982_640...00x225.jpg]Al Gore said the Arctic Ice would be gone by 2013. It grew 30% in 2013. (Photo Courtesy of The Daily Mail.[/color]
Global Warming is on it’s deathbed! It seems that the American people are not falling for Al Gore’s lies. A new Gallup poll reveals that only 32% of the public are worried about it a “great deal.” That is back to the level we found in the 80’s which of course was on the heals of the failed Global Cooling hoax.
Maybe it is because there has been no warming for 2 decades now.
Maybe it is because they found out that while Al Gore was claiming the Arctic shelf would be gone by last year, that he failed to mention the Antarctic was growing.
Maybe it is because he said in 2008 that the entire Arctic Shelf would be gone by 2013  and that it is not only not gone, it is  growing again. (By 30% in 2013)
Maybe it was because after he claimed in 2008 that the Arctic Ice would be totally gone by 2013, that by 2012, it had already grown by 50%.
Maybe it is because they found out that the scientists were fudging the data on the temperatures.
Maybe it is because they found out that the IPCC (United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) has been lying.
Maybe it is because most of the facts laid out in his movie have since been proven to be lies.
Maybe it is because the American public does not like to be threatened when they exercise their 1st Amendment rights and disagree with him.
Maybe it is because Al Gore recently bought beach front property after claiming the oceans are going to rise 20 ft!
Maybe it is because Barak Obama bought the ‘Magnum P.I.’ ocean front property after warning of catastrophic rising of sea levels.
Maybe it is because Climate models showing global warming have been wrong 95% of the time.
Whatever the reason, people are not really falling for it anymore.
For those who would like to read some good scientific discussion on the topic of climate change, I would suggest, A Discussion of Global Warming and Latest Developments by Dr. Mason Wilson.
Reply
#30
'Climate hoax' hoax.
Sure compare 2012 ice to 2013.
2012 was a record low ice year. why not also look at 2010, 2005, 2000.

2013 doesn't look so great.
we are currently at the lowest ice level for this date then ever in our records. The south pole is also at the lowest ice level for this date.



PS
The earth is not flat or hollow.
Just in case you think the round earth theory is also a hoax.
Reply
#31
You don't even read your own shit.


Quote:Maybe it is because there has been no warming for 2 decades now.

check the link out.
Quote:The current favorite argument of those who argue that climate changes isn’t happening, or a problem, or worth dealing with, is that global warming has stopped. Therefore (they conclude) scientists must be wrong when they say that climate change is caused by humans, worsening, and ultimately a serious environmental problem that must be addressed by policy makers.

The problem with this argument is that it is false: global warming has not stopped and those who repeat this claim over and over are either lying, ignorant, or exhibiting a blatant disregard for the
Reply
#32
Quote:be gone by last year, that he failed to mention the Antarctic was growing.

really from Sept. 2014

Look at the antartic ice now

http://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/charct...ice-graph/

compare 2013 with 2016, and look at 2017.
We have never been this low on ice .
Reply
#33
Quote:In the Arctic something odd is taking place. Temperatures in Spitzbergen, on the Norwegian island of Svalbard, hit a balmy 4C on Monday,

At this time of year they should be around minus 16C. Instead locals are having to adapt to a fast-changing environment, one that leaves Norway’s environment minister Vidar Helgesen in a sweat.

http://www.climatechangenews.com/2017/02...it-norway/
Reply
#34
http://www.lifezette.com/polizette/uncov...-cheating/

Uncovering the Extent of Global Warming Cheating
[color=rgba(27, 27, 27, 0.65098)]Once experts aren't bound by politics, the truth about climate change surfaces[/color]
February 14, 2017
For those who follow the heated squabbling of climate alarmists and skeptics, this has been a bombshell week. John Bates, a recently retired scientist at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), has revealed that a 2015 study by the government agency was riddled with bias and questionable methodology.
More specifically, NOAA released a study in 2015 announcing that we haven’t had a “pause” in global warming over the past 15 years. Although the study flatly contradicted data from satellites and weather balloons documenting a net flatlining of temperatures, its findings were cited prominently at the 2015 Paris climate talks. The resulting Paris accord called for major decarbonization efforts worldwide.
Quote:[color=rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.65098)]“One has to wonder why, if the case for man-made warming is so tenuous, would alarmists resort to such questionable methods.”[/color]
According to Bates, the “pausebuster” study, led by former NOAA Director Thomas Karl, was rushed to publication before underlying data issues were resolved. Bates says that Karl was “insisting on decisions and scientific choices that maximized warming and minimized documentation.”
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)