05-15-2019, 04:31 PM
I guess I'm biased but I'm unwilling to find PG&E totally responsible for the deadliest fire in California's history.
What about mismanaged forests? Fires are and always have been a natural occurrence. When we don't allow them to burn naturally like we always have we completely changed the structure of our forests.
This is not just my opinion it's a matter of fact. It's our fault the forests are thick with small trees and dead wood that has built up over time.
It's also not PG&E's fault that a whole city was literally built in the line of fire. Or that rare extremely high winds would make a fire move at an acre a second and create hurricane force winds.
There are are those who cry foul that PG&E is filing bankruptcy as if that's just a trick to not pay. I always thought whether a bankruptcy was allowed or not was decided by a judge base on whether or not the business is actually able to pay what they owe.
What about mismanaged forests? Fires are and always have been a natural occurrence. When we don't allow them to burn naturally like we always have we completely changed the structure of our forests.
This is not just my opinion it's a matter of fact. It's our fault the forests are thick with small trees and dead wood that has built up over time.
It's also not PG&E's fault that a whole city was literally built in the line of fire. Or that rare extremely high winds would make a fire move at an acre a second and create hurricane force winds.
There are are those who cry foul that PG&E is filing bankruptcy as if that's just a trick to not pay. I always thought whether a bankruptcy was allowed or not was decided by a judge base on whether or not the business is actually able to pay what they owe.