Posts: 4,926
Threads: 34
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 41,856
Threads: 560
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,926
Threads: 34
Joined: Nov 2013
(11-11-2018, 08:01 PM)tvguy Wrote: (11-11-2018, 07:16 PM)Cuzz Wrote: (11-11-2018, 06:50 PM)tvguy Wrote: (11-11-2018, 06:20 PM)Cuzz Wrote: (11-11-2018, 02:18 PM)tvguy Wrote: In other words you agree with what I said originally. OK then. Was that so hard
Not at all. And let me say how very delighted I am that you have finally caught up to the rest of the conversation.
Not at all my ass LOL, the conversation was me saying there is no solution and you saying yes there is. But there is NO solution" and I mean that using the definition of the word.. And I shouldn't need a disclaimer.
No you don't. You say there is no solution and then your logical and analytical self defines what kind of solution is acceptable. You don't see the audacity of that?
No but I see a lot of humor in how for whatever reason you can't accept a fact.
I didn't define "solution" It's in the dictionary. It means to "solve" a problem. And I didn't define "solve" either.
I'll have to repeat my last comment...
"You say there is no solution and then your logical and analytical self defines what kind of solution is acceptable. You don't see the audacity of that?"
Just because you don't like a solution or believe it is politically realistic doesn't define it as not a solution. You need to make your case against it. I'll probably agree with you.
Posts: 41,856
Threads: 560
Joined: Mar 2009
(11-11-2018, 08:58 PM)Cuzz Wrote: (11-11-2018, 08:01 PM)tvguy Wrote: (11-11-2018, 07:16 PM)Cuzz Wrote: (11-11-2018, 06:50 PM)tvguy Wrote: (11-11-2018, 06:20 PM)Cuzz Wrote: Not at all. And let me say how very delighted I am that you have finally caught up to the rest of the conversation.
Not at all my ass LOL, the conversation was me saying there is no solution and you saying yes there is. But there is NO solution" and I mean that using the definition of the word.. And I shouldn't need a disclaimer.
No you don't. You say there is no solution and then your logical and analytical self defines what kind of solution is acceptable. You don't see the audacity of that?
No but I see a lot of humor in how for whatever reason you can't accept a fact.
I didn't define "solution" It's in the dictionary. It means to "solve" a problem. And I didn't define "solve" either.
I'll have to repeat my last comment...
"You say there is no solution and then your logical and analytical self defines what kind of solution is acceptable. You don't see the audacity of that?"
Just because you don't like a solution or believe it is politically realistic doesn't define it as not a solution. You need to make your case against it. I'll probably agree with you.
Crazy bastards killing people is a problem that can't be solved. All that can be done is to take measures to stop some people.
2+2 is a problem that can be solved. When I go fishing sometimes I snag my gear and I have to break the line.
That's a problem that can't be solved.
I guess you must think if I brought SCUBA gear I could solve the problem. But that's ridiculous so being reasonable
( and I am) I and everyone else will just accept the fact that this is a problem you deal with and don't solve.
Exactly like any idea of what you might want to call a solution to mass killings with guns.
So valuesize asked SD if he had a "solution" to this problem. I said there is no solution.
I thought the definition of the word made what I said clear. It should.
Posts: 5,371
Threads: 65
Joined: Jan 2011
(11-12-2018, 02:40 PM)tvguy Wrote: (11-11-2018, 08:58 PM)Cuzz Wrote: (11-11-2018, 08:01 PM)tvguy Wrote: (11-11-2018, 07:16 PM)Cuzz Wrote: (11-11-2018, 06:50 PM)tvguy Wrote: Not at all my ass LOL, the conversation was me saying there is no solution and you saying yes there is. But there is NO solution" and I mean that using the definition of the word.. And I shouldn't need a disclaimer.
No you don't. You say there is no solution and then your logical and analytical self defines what kind of solution is acceptable. You don't see the audacity of that?
No but I see a lot of humor in how for whatever reason you can't accept a fact.
I didn't define "solution" It's in the dictionary. It means to "solve" a problem. And I didn't define "solve" either.
I'll have to repeat my last comment...
"You say there is no solution and then your logical and analytical self defines what kind of solution is acceptable. You don't see the audacity of that?"
Just because you don't like a solution or believe it is politically realistic doesn't define it as not a solution. You need to make your case against it. I'll probably agree with you.
Crazy bastards killing people is a problem that can't be solved. All that can be done is to take measures to stop some people.
2+2 is a problem that can be solved. When I go fishing sometimes I snag my gear and I have to break the line.
That's a problem that can't be solved.
I guess you must think if I brought SCUBA gear I could solve the problem. But that's ridiculous so being reasonable
( and I am) I and everyone else will just accept the fact that this is a problem you deal with and don't solve.
Exactly like any idea of what you might want to call a solution to mass killings with guns.
So valuesize asked SD if he had a "solution" to this problem. I said there is no solution.
I thought the definition of the word made what I said clear. It should.
I'm not sure I agree. I think it's a behavior that stems from very deep frustration and unhappiness that is permeating society. Now I don't know what the solution is to that, but I don't think it's a problem that cannot be solved. I don't have the solution, but I think it could change. I believe it's like an illness and illnesses can be cured. Find the cure is the challenge.
Posts: 4,926
Threads: 34
Joined: Nov 2013
(11-12-2018, 02:40 PM)tvguy Wrote: (11-11-2018, 08:58 PM)Cuzz Wrote: (11-11-2018, 08:01 PM)tvguy Wrote: (11-11-2018, 07:16 PM)Cuzz Wrote: (11-11-2018, 06:50 PM)tvguy Wrote: Not at all my ass LOL, the conversation was me saying there is no solution and you saying yes there is. But there is NO solution" and I mean that using the definition of the word.. And I shouldn't need a disclaimer.
No you don't. You say there is no solution and then your logical and analytical self defines what kind of solution is acceptable. You don't see the audacity of that?
No but I see a lot of humor in how for whatever reason you can't accept a fact.
I didn't define "solution" It's in the dictionary. It means to "solve" a problem. And I didn't define "solve" either.
I'll have to repeat my last comment...
"You say there is no solution and then your logical and analytical self defines what kind of solution is acceptable. You don't see the audacity of that?"
Just because you don't like a solution or believe it is politically realistic doesn't define it as not a solution. You need to make your case against it. I'll probably agree with you.
Crazy bastards killing people is a problem that can't be solved. All that can be done is to take measures to stop some people.
2+2 is a problem that can be solved. When I go fishing sometimes I snag my gear and I have to break the line.
That's a problem that can't be solved.
I guess you must think if I brought SCUBA gear I could solve the problem. But that's ridiculous so being reasonable
( and I am) I and everyone else will just accept the fact that this is a problem you deal with and don't solve.
Exactly like any idea of what you might want to call a solution to mass killings with guns.
So valuesize asked SD if he had a "solution" to this problem. I said there is no solution.
I thought the definition of the word made what I said clear. It should.
It's plain you and I don't agree here. I see no point in circling back around yet again.
Posts: 41,856
Threads: 560
Joined: Mar 2009
11-13-2018, 03:07 PM
(This post was last modified: 11-13-2018, 03:14 PM by tvguy. Edited 1 time in total.)
(11-12-2018, 05:57 PM)Juniper Wrote: (11-12-2018, 02:40 PM)tvguy Wrote: (11-11-2018, 08:58 PM)Cuzz Wrote: (11-11-2018, 08:01 PM)tvguy Wrote: (11-11-2018, 07:16 PM)Cuzz Wrote: No you don't. You say there is no solution and then your logical and analytical self defines what kind of solution is acceptable. You don't see the audacity of that?
No but I see a lot of humor in how for whatever reason you can't accept a fact.
I didn't define "solution" It's in the dictionary. It means to "solve" a problem. And I didn't define "solve" either.
I'll have to repeat my last comment...
"You say there is no solution and then your logical and analytical self defines what kind of solution is acceptable. You don't see the audacity of that?"
Just because you don't like a solution or believe it is politically realistic doesn't define it as not a solution. You need to make your case against it. I'll probably agree with you.
Crazy bastards killing people is a problem that can't be solved. All that can be done is to take measures to stop some people.
2+2 is a problem that can be solved. When I go fishing sometimes I snag my gear and I have to break the line.
That's a problem that can't be solved.
I guess you must think if I brought SCUBA gear I could solve the problem. But that's ridiculous so being reasonable
( and I am) I and everyone else will just accept the fact that this is a problem you deal with and don't solve.
Exactly like any idea of what you might want to call a solution to mass killings with guns.
So valuesize asked SD if he had a "solution" to this problem. I said there is no solution.
I thought the definition of the word made what I said clear. It should.
I'm not sure I agree. I think it's a behavior that stems from very deep frustration and unhappiness that is permeating society. Now I don't know what the solution is to that, but I don't think it's a problem that cannot be solved. I don't have the solution, but I think it could change. I believe it's like an illness and illnesses can be cured. Find the cure is the challenge. There's no cure for mental all illness and even if there was what makes you think they would all be diagnosed cured before they started killing?
Besides I don't think it's always because of mental illness. It can be from pure hatred.
Think about the las Vegas shooter. He was a college grad and rich. No one to this day know why he did what he did.
So how could he have been stopped.
Posts: 41,856
Threads: 560
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,103
Threads: 262
Joined: May 2013
11-17-2018, 09:19 AM
(This post was last modified: 11-17-2018, 09:23 AM by SFLiberal. Edited 2 times in total.)
Rep. Swalwell wants to buy back guns. Below he how he wants to deal with resisters.
Posts: 5,103
Threads: 262
Joined: May 2013
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Posts: 5,103
Threads: 262
Joined: May 2013
Molon Labe
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Posts: 5,103
Threads: 262
Joined: May 2013
Got to love liberal gun experts
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Posts: 41,856
Threads: 560
Joined: Mar 2009
(11-17-2018, 10:25 AM)SFLiberal Wrote: Got to love liberal gun experts
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk What am I supposed to be seeing?
Posts: 4,926
Threads: 34
Joined: Nov 2013
(11-17-2018, 03:52 PM)tvguy Wrote: (11-17-2018, 10:25 AM)SFLiberal Wrote: Got to love liberal gun experts
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk What am I supposed to be seeing?
A big ass red arrow. Everybody that knows anything about guns knows they don't have big ass red arrows! They're guns not bows!
Posts: 41,856
Threads: 560
Joined: Mar 2009
|