07-07-2014, 03:32 PM
(07-07-2014, 03:26 PM)tvguy Wrote:(07-07-2014, 03:17 PM)Scrapper Wrote: BTW, if you look back to my original post regarding this matter...
(07-07-2014, 07:09 AM)Scrapper Wrote: Just because one person can't see the value in something doesn't mean the value is not there.
I wasn't the one being antagonistic.
So friggin bite me.
Yeah well your explanation doesn't work because even after I carefully explained what I meant by value you just repeated your original post like I was too dense to understand.
It think it was purposely antagonistic just like Hugo surmised.
It's not about a value I can't see. It's about a cash value that simply is inaccurate based on what the cash value REALLY is.
NOTHING determines a cash value any better that a RECORD of what people are currently paying for an item.
Where in the hell do real estate people get cash values on homes?
How the hell do you think appraisers put a cash value on an item?
It's all based on comparing an item to what the same or similar item is selling for.
How the eff is this antagonistic?
(07-07-2014, 07:09 AM)Scrapper Wrote: Just because one person can't see the value in something doesn't mean the value is not there.
If you think THAT is antagonistic then you better grow some thicker skin. If you are whining about THAT being antagonistic... it just makes you look like a big whining boob!