Say, this admission on Benghazi terrorist attack might cause Obama a few problems
#61
outright bullshit lies.
Reply
#62
(01-26-2013, 08:19 PM)bbqboy Wrote: outright bullshit lies.

Maybe you could point out which ones
Reply
#63
(01-26-2013, 09:01 PM)orygunluvr Wrote:
(01-26-2013, 08:19 PM)bbqboy Wrote: outright bullshit lies.

Maybe you could point out which ones

You're the one arguing for a conspiracy. You bear the burden of proof.

I'll make it easy for you. I believe every single thing the administration has said regarding Benghazi.

Present evidence to prove one lie.
Reply
#64
(01-27-2013, 10:41 PM)MarkM Wrote:
(01-26-2013, 09:01 PM)orygunluvr Wrote:
(01-26-2013, 08:19 PM)bbqboy Wrote: outright bullshit lies.

Maybe you could point out which ones

You're the one arguing for a conspiracy. You bear the burden of proof.

I'll make it easy for you. I believe every single thing the administration has said regarding Benghazi.

Present evidence to prove one lie.

Funny how suddenly you enjoy posting about websites and vegetables yet are so silent on Benghazi.

Is this a white flag operation?
Reply
#65
[Image: clinton_benghazi_obama_approves.jpg]
Reply
#66
(01-27-2013, 10:59 PM)MarkM Wrote:
(01-27-2013, 10:41 PM)MarkM Wrote:
(01-26-2013, 09:01 PM)orygunluvr Wrote:
(01-26-2013, 08:19 PM)bbqboy Wrote: outright bullshit lies.

Maybe you could point out which ones

You're the one arguing for a conspiracy. You bear the burden of proof.

I'll make it easy for you. I believe every single thing the administration has said regarding Benghazi.

Present evidence to prove one lie.

Funny how suddenly you enjoy posting about websites and vegetables yet are so silent on Benghazi.

Is this a white flag operation?

The burden of proof is in the investigation that shows all the emails sent to Hillary and her aides, that show that she denied extra security. You believe that it doesn't matter how they were killed and that they lied about some obscure film being the culprit?
Reply
#67
[Image: bengkazi+coward.jpg]
Reply
#68
(01-28-2013, 02:14 PM)orygunluvr Wrote:
(01-27-2013, 10:59 PM)MarkM Wrote:
(01-27-2013, 10:41 PM)MarkM Wrote:
(01-26-2013, 09:01 PM)orygunluvr Wrote:
(01-26-2013, 08:19 PM)bbqboy Wrote: outright bullshit lies.

Maybe you could point out which ones

You're the one arguing for a conspiracy. You bear the burden of proof.

I'll make it easy for you. I believe every single thing the administration has said regarding Benghazi.

Present evidence to prove one lie.

Funny how suddenly you enjoy posting about websites and vegetables yet are so silent on Benghazi.

Is this a white flag operation?

The burden of proof is in the investigation that shows all the emails sent to Hillary and her aides, that show that she denied extra security. You believe that it doesn't matter how they were killed and that they lied about some obscure film being the culprit?

Mark, what happened? Another case of reality biting you in the ass, again?
Reply
#69
[Image: 72991_136691193165950_1841561228_n.png]
Reply
#70
First dead ambassador in 30 years, outraged leftists? 0. Who's fault according to the leftist administration? George Bush

Who denied security for the ambassador but bought new cars for others? George Bush?
Reply
#71
hillary clinton Blew Benghazi Response

House Republicans have concluded that Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton was responsible for cutting security at the consulate in Benghazi ahead of last year’s attack there, and that the administration lied about why it downplayed terrorism as the cause of the assault.

A new report — the result of months of investigation by five different House committees — says there was plenty of intelligence that presaged the attack, but the State Department and President Obama failed to heed the warnings or give the Defense Department the authority to respond to such an attack.

The report exonerates the Pentagon itself, saying the military did what it could to respond once the attack began, but “was hindered on account of U.S. military forces not being properly postured” beforehand.

In the most damning finding, House Republicans said Mr. Obama and his team lied about the attacks afterward, first by blaming mob violence spawned by an anti-Muslim video, and then wrongly saying it had misled the public because it was trying to protect an FBI investigation.

“This progress report reveals a fundamental lack of understanding at the highest levels of the State Department as to the dangers presented in Benghazi, Libya, as well as a concerted attempt to insulate the Department of State from blame following the terrorist attacks,” the GOP investigation concluded in its 46-page report.

The Obama administration has acknowledged providing an inaccurate explanation for the attacks early on — even though officials at the Defense Department said they knew it was a terrorist assault from the beginning.

But Mr. Obama has vehemently denied he intended to deceive the public.

[Image: images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTyfZT2DJcP9ikDPlNRSAy...gUUNFAQVcZ]

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013...z2RJygM4rm
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)