Posts: 8,021
Threads: 190
Joined: Sep 2012
12-19-2013, 10:00 PM
(This post was last modified: 12-19-2013, 10:01 PM by csrowan. Edited 1 time in total.)
(12-19-2013, 09:57 PM)tornado Wrote: (12-19-2013, 07:59 PM)chuck white Wrote: Quote:Over 1 Million Support Boycotting A&E Following ‘Duck Dynasty’ Star’s Suspension
http://houston.cbslocal.com/2013/12/19/h...uspension/
I think his comment : “It seems like, to me, a vagina – as a man – would be more desirable than a man’s anus. That’s just me,”
Clearly says he is speaking for himself.
He's speaking for men, not all males.
Given the number of heterosexual couples who engage in anal intercourse, it seems to me that, as a man, plenty of men are interested in putting their penises into anuses even when they've got a vagina right in front of them.
Posts: 27,872
Threads: 1,668
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,135
Threads: 90
Joined: Apr 2011
(12-19-2013, 10:00 PM)csrowan Wrote: (12-19-2013, 09:57 PM)tornado Wrote: (12-19-2013, 07:59 PM)chuck white Wrote: Quote:Over 1 Million Support Boycotting A&E Following ‘Duck Dynasty’ Star’s Suspension
http://houston.cbslocal.com/2013/12/19/h...uspension/
I think his comment : “It seems like, to me, a vagina – as a man – would be more desirable than a man’s anus. That’s just me,”
Clearly says he is speaking for himself.
He's speaking for men, not all males.
Given the number of heterosexual couples who engage in anal intercourse, it seems to me that, as a man, plenty of men are interested in putting their penises into anuses even when they've got a vagina right in front of them.
Sounds like Family Feud. I fear to ask how someone knows plenty of men are interested in poop chutes over vaginas. Nevertheless, survey says - Pussy. When a group of a jillion men were asked, do you prefer women over men; most said, I don't care if the woman is on top of me, or under me.
Posts: 18,298
Threads: 867
Joined: Mar 2011
(12-19-2013, 10:00 PM)csrowan Wrote: (12-19-2013, 09:57 PM)tornado Wrote: (12-19-2013, 07:59 PM)chuck white Wrote: Quote:Over 1 Million Support Boycotting A&E Following ‘Duck Dynasty’ Star’s Suspension
http://houston.cbslocal.com/2013/12/19/h...uspension/
I think his comment : “It seems like, to me, a vagina – as a man – would be more desirable than a man’s anus. That’s just me,”
Clearly says he is speaking for himself.
He's speaking for men, not all males.
Given the number of heterosexual couples who engage in anal intercourse, it seems to me that, as a man, plenty of men are interested in putting their penises into anuses even when they've got a vagina right in front of them.
I don't know where you get such information.
I recall many a men bragging about vaginal sex, but don't recall any of them bragging about getting it in the wrong hole. Although I have heard some jokes about it.
Posts: 27,872
Threads: 1,668
Joined: Sep 2009
I remember one friend telling me when he was drunk about telling his amorous girlfriend at the time that it was "brown eye" or nothing. For years afterwards he was wanting to know how I knew.
Posts: 8,021
Threads: 190
Joined: Sep 2012
(12-19-2013, 10:29 PM)tornado Wrote: (12-19-2013, 10:00 PM)csrowan Wrote: (12-19-2013, 09:57 PM)tornado Wrote: (12-19-2013, 07:59 PM)chuck white Wrote: Quote:Over 1 Million Support Boycotting A&E Following ‘Duck Dynasty’ Star’s Suspension
http://houston.cbslocal.com/2013/12/19/h...uspension/
I think his comment : “It seems like, to me, a vagina – as a man – would be more desirable than a man’s anus. That’s just me,”
Clearly says he is speaking for himself.
He's speaking for men, not all males.
Given the number of heterosexual couples who engage in an*l intercourse, it seems to me that, as a man, plenty of men are interested in putting their penises into anuses even when they've got a vagina right in front of them.
Sounds like Family Feud. I fear to ask how someone knows plenty of men are interested in poop chutes over vaginas. Nevertheless, survey says - Pussy. When a group of a jillion men were asked, do you prefer women over men; most said, I don't care if the woman is on top of me, or under me.
For starters, common sense. There's a lot more heterosexual couples out there than homosexual couples. That, and it's been discussed multiple times on this forum before. Like here: http://www.roguevalleyforum.com/forum/sh...#pid284284
But lets pretend it hasn't. Let's pretend that the 9% of men who are homosexual ( http://www.gallup.com/poll/6961/what-per...n-gay.aspx) ALL engage in an*l sex (hint: they don't).
Compare that to the 38.2% of men who engage in heterosexual an*l sex according to the CDC. http://nymag.com/nightlife/mating/25988/
Hmmm... 9%... or 38.2%
Anyone got a calculator...
Posts: 18,298
Threads: 867
Joined: Mar 2011
(12-19-2013, 10:47 PM)csrowan Wrote: (12-19-2013, 10:29 PM)tornado Wrote: (12-19-2013, 10:00 PM)csrowan Wrote: (12-19-2013, 09:57 PM)tornado Wrote: (12-19-2013, 07:59 PM)chuck white Wrote: http://houston.cbslocal.com/2013/12/19/h...uspension/
I think his comment : “It seems like, to me, a vagina – as a man – would be more desirable than a man’s anus. That’s just me,”
Clearly says he is speaking for himself.
He's speaking for men, not all males.
Given the number of heterosexual couples who engage in an*l intercourse, it seems to me that, as a man, plenty of men are interested in putting their penises into anuses even when they've got a vagina right in front of them.
Sounds like Family Feud. I fear to ask how someone knows plenty of men are interested in poop chutes over vaginas. Nevertheless, survey says - Pussy. When a group of a jillion men were asked, do you prefer women over men; most said, I don't care if the woman is on top of me, or under me.
For starters, common sense. There's a lot more heterosexual couples out there than homosexual couples. That, and it's been discussed multiple times on this forum before. Like here: http://www.roguevalleyforum.com/forum/sh...#pid284284
But lets pretend it hasn't. Let's pretend that the 9% of men who are homosexual (http://www.gallup.com/poll/6961/what-per...n-gay.aspx) ALL engage in an*l sex (hint: they don't).
Compare that to the 38.2% of men who engage in heterosexual an*l sex according to the CDC. http://nymag.com/nightlife/mating/25988/
Hmmm... 9%... or 38.2%
Anyone got a calculator...
My calculator says somebody's lying. If that was true AIDS would be as wide spread among straights as it is with crookeds
Posts: 27,872
Threads: 1,668
Joined: Sep 2009
AIDS is predominantly spread by heterosexuals in Africa.
Posts: 18,298
Threads: 867
Joined: Mar 2011
(12-19-2013, 11:03 PM)PonderThis Wrote: AIDS is predominantly spread by heterosexuals in Africa.
That might be because African men like the poop shoot.
Or they don't know better.
Posts: 27,872
Threads: 1,668
Joined: Sep 2009
Rather than hear your speculations, I'd like to see some real data on this. The part about what percentage of heterosexual Americans participate in an*l sex seems well researched, and it seems like you're arguing against basic data here that has been cross verified by numerous studies. And, AIDS is not only spread by an*l sex, either. For a numbers kind of guy, I think you're lacking here.
Posts: 18,298
Threads: 867
Joined: Mar 2011
(12-19-2013, 11:29 PM)PonderThis Wrote: Rather than hear your speculations, I'd like to see some real data on this. The part about what percentage of heterosexual Americans participate in an*l sex seems well researched, and it seems like you're arguing against basic data here that has been cross verified by numerous studies. And, AIDS is not only spread by an*l sex, either. For a numbers kind of guy, I think you're lacking here.
Quote:
The risk of HIV transmission during butt intercourse may be around 18 times greater than during vaginal intercourse, according to the results of a meta-analysis published online ahead of print in the International Journal of Epidemiology.
Moreover, as well as this empirical work, the researchers from Imperial College and the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine carried out a modelling exercise to estimate the impact that HIV treatment has on infectiousness during butt intercourse. They estimate that the risk of transmission from a man with suppressed viral load may be reduced by as much as 99.9%.
butt intercourse drives the HIV epidemic amongst gay and bisexual men. Moreover a substantial proportion of heterosexuals have butt sex but tend to use condoms less frequently than for vaginal sex, and this may contribute to heterosexual epidemics in sub-Saharan Africa and elsewhere.
http://www.aidsmap.com/HIV-transmission-risk-during- butt -sex-18-times-higher-than-during-vaginal-sex/page/1446187/
I had to replace the word anal with butt
Posts: 3,553
Threads: 81
Joined: Oct 2013
meanwhile, back at Duck Dynasty......
I have never watched the show, frankly all the massive amounts of merchandise that has flooded the market has made me dislike the show without even watching it. The "stars" of DD will come through this just fine, they have millions of loyal followers and are a network money making dynasty just a matter of time until this blows over, just ask Paula Dean, Oh wait, bad example....Ask Dog the Bounty Hunter.
Posts: 8,021
Threads: 190
Joined: Sep 2012
(12-20-2013, 04:54 AM)chuck white Wrote: (12-19-2013, 11:29 PM)PonderThis Wrote: Rather than hear your speculations, I'd like to see some real data on this. The part about what percentage of heterosexual Americans participate in an*l sex seems well researched, and it seems like you're arguing against basic data here that has been cross verified by numerous studies. And, AIDS is not only spread by an*l sex, either. For a numbers kind of guy, I think you're lacking here.
Quote:
The risk of HIV transmission during butt intercourse may be around 18 times greater than during vaginal intercourse, according to the results of a meta-analysis published online ahead of print in the International Journal of Epidemiology.
Moreover, as well as this empirical work, the researchers from Imperial College and the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine carried out a modelling exercise to estimate the impact that HIV treatment has on infectiousness during butt intercourse. They estimate that the risk of transmission from a man with suppressed viral load may be reduced by as much as 99.9%.
butt intercourse drives the HIV epidemic amongst gay and bisexual men. Moreover a substantial proportion of heterosexuals have butt sex but tend to use condoms less frequently than for vaginal sex, and this may contribute to heterosexual epidemics in sub-Saharan Africa and elsewhere.
http://www.aidsmap.com/HIV-transmission-risk-during-butt -sex-18-times-higher-than-during-vaginal-sex/page/1446187/
I had to replace the word anal with butt
Could be that the number of people participating in it doesn't have anything to do with the number of times they have it.
Heterosexual couples have an option that male homosexual couples don't have. Maybe they only do it in the butt an average of once every 10 times.
Male homosexual couples don't have the option of a vagina. Maybe they do it in the butt an average of 8 out of every 10 times.
But the point remains that far more heterosexual couples than homosexual couples engage in an*l intercourse. Mainly because there are far more heterosexual couples.
Posts: 4,907
Threads: 170
Joined: Feb 2009
This is starting to make me sick...
EXIT ONLY!
Posts: 8,021
Threads: 190
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 3,193
Threads: 71
Joined: Mar 2011
12-20-2013, 10:47 AM
(This post was last modified: 12-20-2013, 10:48 AM by gapper. Edited 1 time in total.)
What's interesting to me is that those that seem to be most indignant about this business decision are the right wingers. You know, the ones that scream "Free Market baby!!", at most any opportunity. Until, it seems, one of their redneck warriors gets fired for saying something stupid and potentially damaging to his employer, and ends up dismissed indefinitely.
The hypocritical far right wing whines again.
Posts: 3,193
Threads: 71
Joined: Mar 2011
12-20-2013, 10:55 AM
(This post was last modified: 12-20-2013, 10:56 AM by gapper. Edited 1 time in total.)
Bad link.
Posts: 5,103
Threads: 262
Joined: May 2013
12-20-2013, 12:15 PM
(This post was last modified: 12-20-2013, 12:17 PM by SFLiberal. Edited 1 time in total.)
Paglai is partially right. I would use the word Nazis.
Quote:Paglia: Duck Dynasty uproar ‘utterly fascist, utterly Stalinist’
The suspension of Phil Robertson from A&E’s Duck Dynasty is outrageous in a nation that values freedom, according to social critic and openly gay, dissident feminist Camille Paglia.
“I speak with authority here, because I was openly gay before the ‘Stonewall rebellion,’ when it cost you something to be so. And I personally feel as a libertarian that people have the right to free thought and free speech,” Paglia, a professor at the University of the Arts in Philadelphia, said on Laura Ingraham’s radio show Thursday.
“In a democratic country, people have the right to be homophobic as well as they have the right to support homosexuality — as I one hundred percent do. If people are basing their views against gays on the Bible, again they have a right of religious freedom there,” she added.
Robertson has been suspended from Duck Dynasty due to comments he made to GQ that have been deemed “anti-gay.” According to Paglia, the culture has become too politically correct.
“To express yourself in a magazine in an interview — this is the level of punitive PC, utterly fascist, utterly Stalinist, OK, that my liberal colleagues in the Democratic Party and on college campuses have supported and promoted over the last several decades,” Paglia said. “This is the whole legacy of free speech 1960’s that have been lost by my own party.”
Paglia went on to point out that while she is an atheist she respects religion and has been frustrated by the intolerance of gay activists.
“I think that this intolerance by gay activists toward the full spectrum of human beliefs is a sign of immaturity, juvenility,” Paglia said. “This is not the mark of a true intellectual life. This is why there is no cultural life now in the U.S. Why nothing is of interest coming from the major media in terms of cultural criticism. Why the graduates of the Ivy League with their A, A, A+ grades are complete cultural illiterates, etc. is because they are not being educated in any way to give respect to opposing view points.”
“There is a dialogue going on human civilization, for heaven sakes. It’s not just this monologue coming from fanatics who have displaced the religious beliefs of their parents into a political movement,” she added. “And that is what happened to feminism, and that is what happened to gay activism, a fanaticism.”
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2013/12/19/paglia...z2o2mLf6Lz
Quote:TMZ Editor: A&E 'Dishonest,' 'Duck Dynasty' Star Has 'Right' to Express Views
TMZ editor Harvey Levin slammed A&E for its dishonesty after the network indefinitely suspended Duck Dynasty patriarch Phil Robertson this week for remarks to GQ that were supposedly "anti-gay."
Levin, who is himself gay, said A&E knew of Robertson's beliefs when they hired him because Robertson's opinions about gays have been on tape. He noted that the network, aware of Robertson's views, also signed off on the GQ interview.
Levin also said Robertson had a "right" to his beliefs and that they were "religious" and not "hate-based." He added even though he did not agree with Robertson and found his views to be "misdirected," Robertson has a right to express them.
Harvey Levin ? @HarveyLevinTMZ
Follow
I'm gay and I don't agree with Phil, but he has a right to his believes...it's not hate-based...it's religious...misdirected, but his right
10:16 AM - 19 Dec 2013
Harvey Levin ? @HarveyLevinTMZ
Follow
And when Phil did the interview with GQ ... A&E obviously signed off. Of course the reporter was going to ask about his feelings toward gays
10:17 AM - 19 Dec 2013
Harvey Levin ? @HarveyLevinTMZ
Follow
A&E is being so dishonest
10:17 AM - 19 Dec 2013
Harvey Levin ? @HarveyLevinTMZ
Follow
A&E - outrageous for suspending Phil. They knew his beliefs when they hired him..he was ON VIDEO. A&E has a litmus test on what we can say
10:16 AM - 19 Dec 2013
There is a difference between expressing hated and bigotry and expressing your religious views. Only the progressives can't see the difference. They are too stupid.
Posts: 3,193
Threads: 71
Joined: Mar 2011
12-20-2013, 12:36 PM
(This post was last modified: 12-20-2013, 12:51 PM by gapper. Edited 1 time in total.)
A&E is a private company who's freedom to fire someone for saying anything they may not like, is just as protected and just as important as some TV star's right to say stupid stuff publicly.
You righties are sure fickle when it comes to the freedom and rights you whine about so much.
Free Market baby!! It works both ways, whiners.
Posts: 5,988
Threads: 1,754
Joined: Mar 2011
Actually this whole thing is a fraud.
They already have many of next seasons episodes in the can so he will be on the air starting in January anyway.
This entire fiasco, gay bashing is an American spectator sport (especially in the Bible belt) and will be forgotten by the time they need to shoot him in the final episodes. So there is little doubt that he will return without ever being gone.
|