08-10-2016, 09:44 PM
(08-10-2016, 05:48 PM)Cuzz Wrote:(08-10-2016, 02:19 PM)Snail Wrote:(08-09-2016, 07:24 PM)Hugo Wrote:(08-09-2016, 01:19 PM)Hugo Wrote: https://wattsupwiththat.com/2016/08/09/s...ing-ahead/
It's a shame when sound science, not coming from a scientist with an agenda, but one actually studying his field, has to see his research maligned by those WITH an agenda.
This is a fascinating article about the cycles of the sun, and how much we DON'T know yet, but are learning.
Interesting. Y'all responding to PAST postings, instead of the one in front of you?
People either don't like you or are afraid you might attack them for no good reason. I'm just guessing.
I looked at it. I didn't think there was anything there. It basically said someone discovered there was two sources of magnetic fields in the sun not just one. Then it leaps to making some pretty well defined predictions of future sun activity and earth climate changes. Either they left out a TON of stuff or they're quacks. From just the article, there's no way to judge which.
You right the article is to far removed from the source.
try this for more details
http://www.iflscience.com/environment/mi...l-warming/