Record Breaking Weather

[tvguy]

 You just shot down your own argument!
What you posted was about CLIMATE. 
Weather is what we will have tomorrow.

It went over your head once again. What I posted was about how science can and does determine what kind of climate we had in the past.
Because you repeatedly claim there is no reliable info past "about 100 years".
I repeatedly prove that's not true. But you are so stuck in the mud with your theory that we don't know shit about the past I prove we do even knowing it's pointless.



noun: weather
1.
the state of the atmosphere at a place and time as regards heat, dryness, sunshine, wind, rain, etc.

Right. Weather is what happens at a time a place. When it happened a long time ago and science makes conclusions about information revealed, it was about the climate. 
Now, if science could narrow it down to a week in September 1305, it would be about WEATHER.

Your semantics argument is just stupid.

When all else fails, suggest the other person is stupid. 

I didn't. You are all wrapped up in the meaning of a couple of words as if it matters.


We either have science that shows us weather patterns in the past by many different ways or we don't.

You can't defend your argument "We have only been keeping reliable records for about 100 years (maybe less)"
You put forth as if it was a fact. I prove it's not OVER AND OVER and now you want to argue about the difference in climate and weather???