Walden demands federal audit of Cover Oregon
#21
(02-15-2014, 08:53 AM)tornado Wrote: Well, you may call it rightwing bluster, I call it taxpayer rip-off by incompetent democrats. If you are happy with the website screw up, then good for you.

I'm pointing out a work around. I see no need for further investigations. To compare the 47 plans that I looked at would have been a practical impossibility w/o the site.
I pick, I call my insurance people.
How many investigations are needed? Perhaps there is irony in multiple investigations to investigate what didn't work well (enough).
You used the MMT to support your argument, I use the MMT to support my view. Interesting I'd say...
BTW Incompetent democrats? Looked at Congress in a while?
I would btw support an investigation into Congresses and their inability to do anything.
Reply
#22
Not being overly concern with cover Oregon. (I get insurance through work). I haven't paid much attention to this. I did a little checking and it appears that the Governor appointed Rocky King to head up Cover Oregon.

Funny how Rocky suddenly retires in December for medical reasons.

Rocky seems more like a white collar with a history in medical insurance industry.
Rocky is not a software writer. It appears that he turned to Oracle to develop the software.

Oracle headed by Larry Ellison, Net Worth $41 Billion, as of September 2013.

I'm not sure he is, right-wing or left-wing. At that level they just play them against each other.
Reply
#23
(02-15-2014, 09:20 AM)Willie Krash Wrote:
(02-15-2014, 08:53 AM)tornado Wrote: Well, you may call it rightwing bluster, I call it taxpayer rip-off by incompetent democrats. If you are happy with the website screw up, then good for you.

I'm pointing out a work around. I see no need for further investigations. To compare the 47 plans that I looked at would have been a practical impossibility w/o the site.
I pick, I call my insurance people.
How many investigations are needed? Perhaps there is irony in multiple investigations to investigate what didn't work well (enough).
You used the MMT to support your argument, I use the MMT to support my view. Interesting I'd say...
BTW Incompetent democrats? Looked at Congress in a while?
I would btw support an investigation into Congresses and their inability to do anything.
Willie, I used the Mail Tribune as a link to report a story, not to support a view point.
Reply
#24
(02-15-2014, 10:14 AM)chuck white Wrote: Not being overly concern with cover Oregon. (I get insurance through work). I haven't paid much attention to this. I did a little checking and it appears that the Governor appointed Rocky King to head up Cover Oregon.

Funny how Rocky suddenly retires in December for medical reasons.

Rocky seems more like a white collar with a history in medical insurance industry.
Rocky is not a software writer. It appears that he turned to Oracle to develop the software.

Oracle headed by Larry Ellison, Net Worth $41 Billion, as of September 2013.

I'm not sure he is, right-wing or left-wing. At that level they just play them against each other.

You work? For some reason I thought you were independently wealthy... or something. Wink Razz Big Grin
Reply
#25
http://hotair.com/archives/2014/02/14/vi...gon-audit/

Video: What happened to the Cover Oregon audit?
posted at 10:01 am on February 14, 2014 by Ed Morrissey

How did Cover Oregon blow through more than $120 million and end up with a completely non-functional website? One year ago, when Oregon officials raised questions about the project and the contracts going to Oracle, Oregon Health Authority CIO told other state officials in a Cover Oregon meeting that the Secretary of State’s office had conducted an audit of the contracts, and found no problem. A year later, no one can find any evidence of that audit, which adds yet another dimension to the allegations of fraud involving Carolyn Lawson and Cover Oregon. KATU continues its in-depth investigation of the scandal:

The report goes on to say the issue was resolved, citing an audit by the Secretary of State’s office that “found everything in order.”

But the KATU On Your Side Investigators have learned that that audit – the only piece of evidence used to dismiss major accountability problems surrounding a contract that eventually grew to $119 million – doesn’t exist.

That audit was particularly important because the state’s contract with Oracle lacked the safeguards government’s usually put in place to ensure transparency. ….

The KATU Investigators contacted the Secretary of State’s office to ask for a copy of the audit.

Three different people responded, none of whom had a record of it, and finally it was suggested the Department of Administrative Service might know more.

DAS didn’t know of such an audit either, and referred KATU to the Legislative Fiscal Office.

The LFO didn’t know anything about it, referring KATU back to the Secretary of State’s office.

“I checked with our managers and there is no audit that would substantiate the statement that ‘a SOS audit found everything in order,’” Secretary of State auditor Gary Blackmer wrote to KATU News. “We have not conducted any audits of procurement or accounting practices related to the DHS/OHA Oracle contract.”

The video gives a pretty good overview, but you’ll want to read the full article as well. The QA group Maximus did its own audit, which found exactly the opposite of what Lawson told the rest of the team in that meeting. The problem was that the contracts essentially amounted to “blank checks” because the Cover Oregon team had little documentation about what Oracle was being contracted to produce, and what was provided (Statements of Work, or SOWs) were entirely inadequate. In addition, Maximus found that Oracle used the funds to perform work “outside the scope of the HIX-IT project” — or in other words, it used Cover Oregon money to do other work.

It’s not as if this problem was unnoticed. In that February 2013 meeting, the other Cover Oregon players clearly had concerns about this issue. Lawson put them off by making her claim about the SoS audit, but not everyone was buying it. It also raises the question — again — of what Governor John Kitzhaber knew about the failures of this project and when he knew it. Lawson ended up in tears during the meeting, according to KATU, and at least one of the attendees presumably had a reporting relationship to Kitzhaber (interim state CIO Julie Pearson). It’s difficult to believe that concerns of that depth and at that level eight months before the rollout deadline wouldn’t have reached Kitzhaber’s desk at that time, let alone down the line when the project was clearly derailing.

Don’t be surprised to see fraud investigations at a couple of levels resulting from this scandal.
Reply
#26
Quote:Carolyn Lawson, CIO of the Oregon Health Authority and Department of Human Services, has resigned for personal reasons.

December 24, 2013

same link

http://www.govtech.com/health/Oregon-Hea...ffort.html


seems a lot of people are resigning

Quote:Rocky King, Cover Oregon's executive director, gave notice of his resignation on Jan. 1, clearing the way for a permanent replacement.

http://www.oregonlive.com/health/index.s..._ki_1.html
Reply
#27
It looks like the blame comes down to Carolyn Lawson.
Quote:It was Lawson, chief information officer at the Oregon Health Authority, who decided the state could manage the complex exchange project itself, rather than hire a private-sector systems integrator, a decision since criticized by her superiors. Lawson also was close to Oracle Corp., the California technology giant that has been blamed for doing shoddy work and repeatedly missing deadlines.

http://www.oregonlive.com/business/index..._over.html

It appears Oracle got a fat contract and did a shit ass job.

Makes me wonder about other Oracle products.
Reply
#28
(02-15-2014, 11:11 AM)chuck white Wrote: It looks like the blame comes down to Carolyn Lawson.
Quote:It was Lawson, chief information officer at the Oregon Health Authority, who decided the state could manage the complex exchange project itself, rather than hire a private-sector systems integrator, a decision since criticized by her superiors. Lawson also was close to Oracle Corp., the California technology giant that has been blamed for doing shoddy work and repeatedly missing deadlines.

http://www.oregonlive.com/business/index..._over.html

It appears Oracle got a fat contract and did a shit ass job.

Makes me wonder about other Oracle products.

I've administered a few of their products over the years and while some were tedious and required frequent updates, ALL of them were solid on the customer end.
Reply
#29
(02-15-2014, 10:18 AM)tornado Wrote:
(02-15-2014, 09:20 AM)Willie Krash Wrote:
(02-15-2014, 08:53 AM)tornado Wrote: Well, you may call it rightwing bluster, I call it taxpayer rip-off by incompetent democrats. If you are happy with the website screw up, then good for you.

I'm pointing out a work around. I see no need for further investigations. To compare the 47 plans that I looked at would have been a practical impossibility w/o the site.
I pick, I call my insurance people.
How many investigations are needed? Perhaps there is irony in multiple investigations to investigate what didn't work well (enough).
You used the MMT to support your argument, I use the MMT to support my view. Interesting I'd say...
BTW Incompetent democrats? Looked at Congress in a while?
I would btw support an investigation into Congresses and their inability to do anything.
Willie, I used the Mail Tribune as a link to report a story, not to support a view point.
Fair enough, thanks.
i accept that, you threw me with "incompetent democrats.."Big Grin
Reply
#30
(02-15-2014, 02:37 PM)Willie Krash Wrote:
(02-15-2014, 10:18 AM)tornado Wrote:
(02-15-2014, 09:20 AM)Willie Krash Wrote:
(02-15-2014, 08:53 AM)tornado Wrote: Well, you may call it rightwing bluster, I call it taxpayer rip-off by incompetent democrats. If you are happy with the website screw up, then good for you.

I'm pointing out a work around. I see no need for further investigations. To compare the 47 plans that I looked at would have been a practical impossibility w/o the site.
I pick, I call my insurance people.
How many investigations are needed? Perhaps there is irony in multiple investigations to investigate what didn't work well (enough).
You used the MMT to support your argument, I use the MMT to support my view. Interesting I'd say...
BTW Incompetent democrats? Looked at Congress in a while?
I would btw support an investigation into Congresses and their inability to do anything.
Willie, I used the Mail Tribune as a link to report a story, not to support a view point.
Fair enough, thanks.
i accept that, you threw me with "incompetent democrats.."Big Grin
You didn't see "incompetent democrats", in my first post. Throwing a light weight is easy. Throwing an elephant is a bit harder.
Smiling
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)