Meeting of The Banned

[cletus1]

Tomorrow morning at 8:00 AM, anyone that is banned is invited to this thread for group. If you don't show up because you cant post, I understand. Formerly banned members are expected to attend. That means you too PonderThis. TVguy says we don't need you because I am a good replacement. I disagree; I am not a good substitute for you.

We will discuss any issues you may have. If you don't have any issues, we will discuss mine; I got plenty. If you have issues bring tissues not guitars or ukuleles.

[Wonky]

Tomorrow morning at 8:00 AM, anyone that is banned is invited to this thread for group. If you don't show up because you cant post, I understand. Formerly banned members are expected to attend. That means you too PonderThis. TVguy says we don't need you because I am a good replacement. I disagree; I am not a good substitute for you.

We will discuss any issues you may have. If you don't have any issues, we will discuss mine; I got plenty. If you have issues bring tissues not guitars or ukuleles.

I wonder if I may be allowed to forward my issues prior to the meeting. My list would require far too much time to deliver orally.
Will refreshments be serviced? What kind? How much? Can we take home what is left, if anything?
May we bring printed materiel to support our solutions to other peoples problems?
This is a great idea! I think we should do this in four day sessions. How generous of you to open your home for this.

[cletus1]

Tomorrow morning at 8:00 AM, anyone that is banned is invited to this thread for group. If you don't show up because you cant post, I understand. Formerly banned members are expected to attend. That means you too PonderThis. TVguy says we don't need you because I am a good replacement. I disagree; I am not a good substitute for you.

We will discuss any issues you may have. If you don't have any issues, we will discuss mine; I got plenty. If you have issues bring tissues not guitars or ukuleles.

I wonder if I may be allowed to forward my issues prior to the meeting. My list would require far too much time to deliver orally.
Will refreshments be serviced? What kind? How much? Can we take home what is left, if anything?
May we bring printed materiel to support our solutions to other peoples problems?
This is a great idea! I think we should do this in four day sessions. How generous of you to open your home for this.

It's a virtual meeting Wonky. BYOC and donuts. Make sure you pay for those donuts.

OMG, is that the sun? I got some chores outdoors. See ya later.

[Scar]

Tomorrow morning at 8:00 AM, anyone that is banned is invited to this thread for group. If you don't show up because you cant post, I understand. Formerly banned members are expected to attend. That means you too PonderThis. TVguy says we don't need you because I am a good replacement. I disagree; I am not a good substitute for you.

We will discuss any issues you may have. If you don't have any issues, we will discuss mine; I got plenty. If you have issues bring tissues not guitars or ukuleles.

[Redacted personal attack. User banned for this post.]

[bbqboy]

Nicely done

[cletus1]

[quote='cletus1' pid='333506' dateline='1393868423']
Tomorrow morning at 8:00 AM, anyone that is banned is invited to this thread for group. If you don't show up because you cant post, I understand. Formerly banned members are expected to attend. That means you too PonderThis. TVguy says we don't need you because I am a good replacement. I disagree; I am not a good substitute for you.

We will discuss any issues you may have. If you don't have any issues, we will discuss mine; I got plenty. If you have issues bring tissues not guitars or ukuleles.

no slime on my hands

[Asquared44]

[quote='cletus1' pid='333506' dateline='1393868423']
Tomorrow morning at 8:00 AM, anyone that is banned is invited to this thread for group. If you don't show up because you cant post, I understand. Formerly banned members are expected to attend. That means you too PonderThis. TVguy says we don't need you because I am a good replacement. I disagree; I am not a good substitute for you.

We will discuss any issues you may have. If you don't have any issues, we will discuss mine; I got plenty. If you have issues bring tissues not guitars or ukuleles.

no slime on my hands

Now THAT is some editing.
I imagine the usual suspects have worn out their mouses' hitting the report button.

I wish Ponder would come back too. He was interesting.... a lil disingenuous, but interesting.
No worries about Scar leaving again... He uses the SF Liberal moniker more anyway.

[Scrapper]

Dadgummit! Twice... and I missed them both! What happened?

Edited to add: Ooohhhh... a month this time. Ouch.

[cletus1]

Dadgummit! Twice... and I missed them both! What happened?

Edited to add: Ooohhhh... a month this time. Ouch.

He called you some vile names and accused csrowan of being gay.

[Scrapper]

Dadgummit! Twice... and I missed them both! What happened?

Edited to add: Ooohhhh... a month this time. Ouch.

He called you some vile names and accused csrowan of being gay.

Me? He must have thought that I had something to do with his banning? That's funny... because I was no where around to even know what happened with either banning.

[cletus1]

Dadgummit! Twice... and I missed them both! What happened?

Edited to add: Ooohhhh... a month this time. Ouch.

He called you some vile names and accused csrowan of being gay.

Me? He must have thought that I had something to do with his banning? That's funny... because I was no where around to even know what happened with either banning.

I think he assumed I reported him because I altered the names he called you into compliments by changing a couple of letters. I then decided to remove my post saying what I said above. He may have assumed I must have been warned and that gave me the opportunity to report. I am speculating of course. No big deal as long as we don't lose Asquared44.

[csrowan]

I think he wanted to get banned. He had to know that post was going to get him banned. I'm just surprised he's not permabanned. That was blatantly asking for it.

Not so much calling me homosexual. I fail to see what's insulting about homosexuality. But the other part was definitely crossing a line.

[cletus1]

I think he wanted to get banned. He had to know that post was going to get him banned. I'm just surprised he's not permabanned. That was blatantly asking for it.

Not so much calling me homosexual. I fail to see what's insulting about homosexuality. But the other part was definitely crossing a line.

The standard in ban sanctions that I mostly see imposed here is: 2 weeks, 1 month, 6 months, then permanent. Although, I have seen some offenders getting the nuclear sanction quicker, mostly when there are threats of violence or lawsuits.

[csrowan]

Meh. Getting banned, coming back, and immediately deliberately getting banned... I'd forgo the niceties of the incremental ban lengths.

But that's just me.

[Asquared44]

Dadgummit! Twice... and I missed them both! What happened?

Edited to add: Ooohhhh... a month this time. Ouch.

He called you some vile names and accused csrowan of being gay.

Me? He must have thought that I had something to do with his banning? That's funny... because I was no where around to even know what happened with either banning.

I think he assumed I reported him because I altered the names he called you into compliments by changing a couple of letters. I then decided to remove my post saying what I said above. He may have assumed I must have been warned and that gave me the opportunity to report. I am speculating of course. No big deal as long as we don't lose Asquared44.

Alright Clete, for throwing that jab, I promise to double my post count in the next 3 years....

As for the insults thrown.... I believe in the golden rule. Basically, if you throw shit at people, don't bitch(or report) when they throw shit back at you.

[tvguy]

Dadgummit! Twice... and I missed them both! What happened?

Edited to add: Ooohhhh... a month this time. Ouch.

He called you some vile names and accused csrowan of being gay.

Me? He must have thought that I had something to do with his banning? That's funny... because I was no where around to even know what happened with either banning.

When were you ever not around?

[tvguy]

[quote='cletus1' pid='333506' dateline='1393868423']
Tomorrow morning at 8:00 AM, anyone that is banned is invited to this thread for group. If you don't show up because you cant post, I understand. Formerly banned members are expected to attend. That means you too PonderThis. TVguy says we don't need you because I am a good replacement. I disagree; I am not a good substitute for you.

We will discuss any issues you may have. If you don't have any issues, we will discuss mine; I got plenty. If you have issues bring tissues not guitars or ukuleles.

no slime on my hands

Now THAT is some editing.
I imagine the usual suspects have worn out their mouses' hitting the report button.

I wish Ponder would come back too. He was interesting.... a lil disingenuous, but interesting.

Fruitcakes are interesting. not too many people like them but still, they are interesting. Like what is the green stuff

[tvguy]

I think he wanted to get banned. He had to know that post was going to get him banned. I'm just surprised he's not permabanned. That was blatantly asking for it.

Not so much calling me homosexual. I fail to see what's insulting about homosexuality. But the other part was definitely crossing a line.

Just for the record Rowan it's insulting to be called a Homo when you aint one. You might want to jot that down for future reference.

[csrowan]

Oh? Is it insulting to be called hetero when you're not?

[charger]

You tell us.