Global Warming
#81
Quote:But it's the rate of change in CO2 concentrations that makes today's situation so unprecedented. During the Permian Triassic extinction event, it took thousands of years for temperatures to rise as high as they did — according to some studies, as many as 150,000 years. During the Paleo-Eocene Thermal Maximum, considered an extremely rapid case of warming, temperatures took 10,000 to 20,000 years to reach their height.

Today's warming has taken only 150 years.

https://www.livescience.com/65927-has-ea...efore.html
Reply
#82
Temperature change, 1895-2018
[Image: hotstates-map-xxxlarge.jpg?v=46]
Reply
#83
Yes I know, you will complain about the source. But that's ok, because you won't even scroll through the hilarious link. 50 years of blown hysterical climate predictions.
https://cei.org/blog/wrong-again-50-year...redictions
Reply
#84
(09-18-2019, 09:41 AM)Someones Dad Wrote: Yes I know, you will complain about the source.  But that's ok, because you won't even scroll through the hilarious link.  50 years of blown hysterical climate predictions.
https://cei.org/blog/wrong-again-50-year...redictions

I suppose you believe the earth is warming but it's not because of the greenhouse affect and greenhouse gasses?
If so THAT is hysterical.
How many of those past prediction's were believed to be true by the vast majority of the worlds leading experts?
Reply
#85
(09-18-2019, 01:07 PM)tvguy Wrote:
(09-18-2019, 09:41 AM)Someones Dad Wrote: Yes I know, you will complain about the source.  But that's ok, because you won't even scroll through the hilarious link.  50 years of blown hysterical climate predictions.
https://cei.org/blog/wrong-again-50-year...redictions


How many of those past prediction's were believed to be true by the vast majority of the worlds leading experts?

So you didn't read any of it.

Yes, they were all believed by most of your so called experts of the time.
Reply
#86
(09-18-2019, 01:21 PM)Someones Dad Wrote:
(09-18-2019, 01:07 PM)tvguy Wrote:
(09-18-2019, 09:41 AM)Someones Dad Wrote: Yes I know, you will complain about the source.  But that's ok, because you won't even scroll through the hilarious link.  50 years of blown hysterical climate predictions.
https://cei.org/blog/wrong-again-50-year...redictions


How many of those past prediction's were believed to be true by the vast majority of the worlds leading experts?

So you didn't read any of it.

Yes, they were all believed by most of your so called experts of the time.

MY so called experts? That's what you think about the thousands of scientists today? That's not ignorance. That's stupidity.
Also you are either a liar or just plain stupid if you think those old predictions were embraced by as many of the worlds experts on climate change as today.

Stubborn people like who can't or won't face facts boggle my mind. I can't really believe you are actually this stupid.
What I think is you have some kind of twisted hatred for the left.
Therefore you FIND any reason you can ( Like the BULLSHIT you just posted) to convince yourself the left and even many of the right believe climate change is not real and caused by human beings.
Reply
#87
(09-18-2019, 03:11 PM)tvguy Wrote:
(09-18-2019, 01:21 PM)Someones Dad Wrote:
(09-18-2019, 01:07 PM)tvguy Wrote:
(09-18-2019, 09:41 AM)Someones Dad Wrote: Yes I know, you will complain about the source.  But that's ok, because you won't even scroll through the hilarious link.  50 years of blown hysterical climate predictions.
https://cei.org/blog/wrong-again-50-year...redictions


How many of those past prediction's were believed to be true by the vast majority of the worlds leading experts?

So you didn't read any of it.

Yes, they were all believed by most of your so called experts of the time.

MY so called experts? That's what you think about the thousands of scientists today? That's not ignorance. That's stupidity.
Also you are either a liar or just plain stupid if you think those old predictions were embraced by as many of the worlds experts on climate change as today.

Stubborn people like who can't or won't face facts boggle my mind. I can't really believe you are actually this stupid.
What I think is you have some kind of twisted hatred for the left.
Therefore you FIND any reason you can ( Like the BULLSHIT you just posted) to convince yourself the left and even many of the right believe climate change is not real and caused by human beings.

I read the article, the whole article, not just what you highlighted. This was the option of one man. not a consensus of 'experts'. We also did not go down the same path after his book 'the population bomb' was released. Many people adopted 2 child policy after that.
Also he was not talking about climate change, he was talking about population control.

I'd say , you're as smart as Donald.
Reply
#88
Mic Drop!



BwaHaHaHa!  Laughing Laughing Laughing
Reply
#89
(09-19-2019, 06:19 AM)chuck white Wrote:
(09-18-2019, 03:11 PM)tvguy Wrote:
(09-18-2019, 01:21 PM)Someones Dad Wrote:
(09-18-2019, 01:07 PM)tvguy Wrote:
(09-18-2019, 09:41 AM)Someones Dad Wrote: Yes I know, you will complain about the source.  But that's ok, because you won't even scroll through the hilarious link.  50 years of blown hysterical climate predictions.
https://cei.org/blog/wrong-again-50-year...redictions


How many of those past prediction's were believed to be true by the vast majority of the worlds leading experts?

So you didn't read any of it.

Yes, they were all believed by most of your so called experts of the time.

MY so called experts? That's what you think about the thousands of scientists today? That's not ignorance. That's stupidity.
Also you are either a liar or just plain stupid if you think those old predictions were embraced by as many of the worlds experts on climate change as today.

Stubborn people like who can't or won't face facts boggle my mind. I can't really believe you are actually this stupid.
What I think is you have some kind of twisted hatred for the left.
Therefore you FIND any reason you can ( Like the BULLSHIT you just posted) to convince yourself the left and even many of the right believe climate change is not real and caused by human beings.

I read the article, the whole article, not just what you highlighted. This was the option of one man. not a consensus of 'experts'. We also did not go down the same path after his book 'the population bomb' was released. Many people adopted 2 child policy after that.
Also he was not talking about climate change, he was talking about population control.

I'd say , you're as smart as Donald.

Laughing  What I highlighted?  I never touched a thing in that link.  And your takeaway from it is bizarre. Are you sure you looked at my link at all?
Reply
#90
More proof liberalism is a mental disorder.  The democrat socialists are freaking nuts..

Reply
#91
(09-19-2019, 09:12 AM)Scrapper Wrote: Mic Drop!



BwaHaHaHa!  Laughing Laughing Laughing

SD is so stubborn and stupid he can't break away from his ignorance and totally outdated and minority views.
That crap he posted from the link is a lot of nonsense and about all he can say is he didn't highlight anything.
Reply
#92
(09-19-2019, 02:51 PM)tvguy Wrote:
(09-19-2019, 09:12 AM)Scrapper Wrote: Mic Drop!



BwaHaHaHa!  Laughing Laughing Laughing

SD is so stubborn and stupid he can't break away from his ignorance and totally outdated and minority views.
That crap he posted from the link is a lot of nonsense and about all he can say is he didn't highlight anything.

100%! 
Reply
#93
(09-18-2019, 09:41 AM)Someones Dad Wrote: Yes I know, you will complain about the source.  But that's ok, because you won't even scroll through the hilarious link.  50 years of blown hysterical climate predictions.
https://cei.org/blog/wrong-again-50-year...redictions

I get it. It's understandable that you would think that. After all the crack pot, stupid ass predictions about the world ending, apocalyptic blathering, sharia law, death panel, gay marriage doom sayin' crap coming from all the church squatters, I don't believe a word they say either.

The only difference is I'm right and you're not.
https://real.hst/blog/wrong-again-2000-y...redictions
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)