Another 14 or So Dead From Mass Shooting

[orygunluvr]

[tvguy]

1,2,3......and yes folks obozo does it again, workplace violence. Pitiful state of affairs you guys are in. 

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/...ium=social

President Obama On California Attack ‘We Don’t Know Why They Did It’ – Could Be ‘Workplace Violence’

Do you really have to be dishonest?? Really? If the truth was on your side. If all the crap you spout here was true then you would post quotes IN CONTEXT and in their ENTIRETY .



“It is possible that this is terrorist-related, but we don’t know; it is also possible this was workplace-related,” Obama said, adding, “we don’t know why they did it.”

[tvguy]

Brilliant. A picture of Obama with words that he never said. Wow REALLY convincing

[Scrapper]

1,2,3......and yes folks obozo does it again, workplace violence. Pitiful state of affairs you guys are in. 

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/...ium=social

President Obama On California Attack ‘We Don’t Know Why They Did It’ – Could Be ‘Workplace Violence’

Do you really have to be dishonest?? Really? If the truth was on your side. If all the crap you spout here was true then you would post quotes IN CONTEXT and in their ENTIRETY .



“It is possible that this is terrorist-related, but we don’t know; it is also possible this was workplace-related,” Obama said, adding, “we don’t know why they did it.”

Yes.  That's obvious.  Because he's a liar... and a moron.

[orygunluvr]

The new leftist media complex talking point by Brian Ross this morning" hybrid workplace jihad" you guys are getting dumber by the minute. 

[tvguy]

The new leftist media complex talking point by Brian Ross this morning" hybrid workplace jihad" you guys are getting dumber by the minute. 

 It appears this guy and his wife were exactly what Brian Ross described. What the hell is wrong with the term?

It basically means the guy may have had workplace issues and was also became a Jihad, a radical Muslim ready to kill for his religion.

So what? Ross said .. "It appears"  Maybe you should turn off that AM radio glued to your head and actually look this stuff up instead of constantly repeating the garbage you hear.

[orygunluvr]

The new leftist media complex talking point by Brian Ross this morning" hybrid workplace jihad" you guys are getting dumber by the minute. 

 It appears this guy and his wife were exactly what Brian Ross described. What the hell is wrong with the term?

It basically means the guy may have had workplace issues and was also became a Jihad, a radical Muslim ready to kill for his religion.

So what? Ross said .. "It appears"  Maybe you should turn off that AM radio glued to your head and actually look this stuff up instead of constantly repeating the garbage you hear.

Like I said, and this post proves once again, you guys are getting dumber by the minute. 

[orygunluvr]

As all you leftist fucks try and blame white male Christian conservative America for mass killings, here's a list your media mouthpieces don't want you to know about. You guys are getting dumber by the minute.

http://m.townhall.com/columnists/anncoul.../page/full

San Bernardino Shooters Unknown: Here Are Some Past Mass Shooters

Dec. 02, 2015
In response to Robert Dear Jr.'s murder of three people at a Colorado Springs shopping mall last week, The New York Times exulted: 
"Even as politicians and those in Congress pump up public fears at the supposed threat of refugees fleeing Syria, every day in America people -- mostly white men -- are walking into movie theaters, restaurants, churches, grade schools and health care centers armed to the teeth, determined to take as many people out as they can."
Mostly white men??? 

I know it didn't happen here, but is the Times really going to ignore the murder of 130 people in Paris two weeks ago? 

Here at home, an Oregon Community College was shot up in October -- by a mixed-race, half-black immigrant, Chris Harper-Mercer. Nine people were killed. It's hard to remember every sensational crime, but that was just two months ago. 
Last year, another mixed-race immigrant, Elliot Rodger, committed mass murder at a sunny college campus in Santa Barbara, killing twice as many people as Robert Dear did -- in half the time! That seemed like a pretty big story to me, but the media passed over it pretty quickly. The Times has airbrushed it from history.



In response to Robert Dear Jr.'s murder of three people at a Colorado Springs shopping mall last week, The New York Times exulted: 

"Even as politicians and those in Congress pump up public fears at the supposed threat of refugees fleeing Syria, every day in America people -- mostly white men -- are walking into movie theaters, restaurants, churches, grade schools and health care centers armed to the teeth, determined to take as many people out as they can." 



Mostly white men??? 

I know it didn't happen here, but is the Times really going to ignore the murder of 130 people in Paris two weeks ago? 

Here at home, an Oregon Community College was shot up in October -- by a mixed-race, half-black immigrant, Chris Harper-Mercer. Nine people were killed. It's hard to remember every sensational crime, but that was just two months ago. 

Last year, another mixed-race immigrant, Elliot Rodger, committed mass murder at a sunny college campus in Santa Barbara, killing twice as many people as Robert Dear did -- in half the time! That seemed like a pretty big story to me, but the media passed over it pretty quickly. The Times has airbrushed it from history. 

Know That Your Pet Is In Good Hands With Professional Grooming From PetSmart 
Promoted by PetSmart

In 2013, two Chechen immigrants -- also allegedly fleeing persecution -- blew up the Boston Marathon. 

In 2012, Haitian immigrant Kesler Dufrene murdered as many people in Miami as Robert Dear did in Colorado Springs. One of Dufrene's victims was a 15-year-old girl. Dufrene had already been convicted of a felony in the United States, so he should have been deported, but our "Deporter in Chief" Obama had blocked his return to Haiti. As the murdered girl's mother said, "Because of immigration, my daughter is not alive." 

Have you ever heard of Dufrene? I don't think his murders got as much press as the "Planned Parenthood" shooting. 

I'm sure you've heard of Jared Loughner. But have you ever heard of Eduardo Sencion?

In 2011, nine months after Loughner's shooting spree in Tucson, Arizona, Sencion, a Mexican immigrant, shot up a Carson City, Nevada, IHOP, killing four Americans, including three National Guardsmen and a 67-year old woman. 

Eduardo was a Mexican immigrant. The Times ran two stories on his mass murder -- on Pages 17 and 18. By contrast, Loughner's shooting got dozens of write-ups in the Times, including at least three front-page articles, three editorials and 10 op-eds. 

The media are tickled pink whenever they have a white perpetrator because it happens so rarely in a country that is majority white. 

In 2009 -- the same year that model second-generation immigrant Nidal Malik Hasan murdered 13 soldiers at Fort Hood -- model first-generation Vietnamese immigrant Jiverly Wong shot and killed 13 people in Binghamton, New York, because he was upset that people disrespected his English skills. 

Who holds the record for the deadliest shooting by a single gunman in U.S. history, you ask? That would be Korean immigrant, Seung-Hui Cho, with 32 murders in a matter of hours at Virginia Tech in 2007. 

The Times cheered anti-gun advocate Carolyn McCarthy's election to Congress, but today, the paper seems to have forgotten the event that propelled her there: the 1993 Long Island Railroad massacre that left six passengers dead, including McCarthy's husband. 

That mass shooting was committed by a Jamaican immigrant, Colin Ferguson. 

It hasn't even been a week, and the Times has already run more than a dozen articles on the shooting at a Colorado Springs shopping mall. Hey -- everybody remember the wall-to-wall coverage of the mass shooting at a Salt Lake City shopping mall in 2007? Five people were killed. 

Here's a clue: Two days after the attack, the Times ran an article titled, "Anti-Bosnian Backlash Is Feared in Utah." (The killer: Bosnian immigrant Sulejman Talovic.) 

After Mexican immigrant Salvador Tapia slaughtered six employees at the Windy City Core Supply warehouse in Chicago in 2003, the Times plastered the story all over -- one article on Page 14 of the late edition. The Washington Post also ran one. 

The media use their own lack of coverage as proof that mass murder by non-whites almost never happens. It's exactly what they're doing to Donald Trump over his claim that a lot of Muslims celebrated the 9/11 attack. 

At the time, normal people were enraged that the media refused to cover the Muslim reaction to 9/11, all while lavishing endless column inches on a non-existent "backlash" against Muslims. 

But now these journalist-referees turn around and insist that the only acceptable proof that Muslims cheered the 9/11 attack is the existence of the very media coverage that they obstinately refused to provide. 

There's a reason most people trust their own recollections over media reports. 
After 20 years of nearly non-stop mass murder by non-white immigrants in a country that is still majority white, our media have the audacity to claim that tens of thousands of Syrian Muslims are less dangerous than the most pacific human beings in world history: 21st-century white American men.

[GPnative]

A rough day at the office equals your wife joining you in shooting up your work place? Yea, don't think so, that in and of itself rules out the workplace violence MO. This was in no way shape or form workplace violence, unless of course you need to fill a narrative, aside from that this was pure unadulterated muslim terrorism that took place at his place of employment because it was an easy hit and he knew the variables, facility and vicinity. To call this work place violence is the biggest perversion of the truth.....this week.

[orygunluvr]

A rough day at the office equals your wife joining you in shooting up your work place? Yea, don't think so, that in and of itself rules out the workplace violence MO. This was in no way shape or form workplace violence, unless of course you need to fill a narrative, aside from that this was pure unadulterated muslim terrorism that took place at his place of employment because it was an easy hit and he knew the variables, facility and vicinity. To call this work place violence is the biggest perversion of the truth.....this week.

So, since women are scourge to muslims, does she get any virgins? Hate to think what kind they would be.

[orygunluvr]

[orygunluvr]

Dumber by the minute.....

http://www.dailywire.com/news/1585/obama-said-americans-safe-isis-style-attack-while-ben-shapiro?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_content=120315-news&utm_campaign=

Obama Said Americans Safe From ISIS-Style Attack -- While Police Hunted San Bernardino Terrorists!
President Obama’s universe must be a wonderful place.

President Obama’s universe must be a wonderful place.

It sure isn’t reality.

In an interview with CNN that aired on Thursday – the day after reportedly ISIS-inspired radical Muslim terrorists murdered 14 people in San Bernardino, California – Obama explained that Americans were safe from ISIS attack like the Paris attacks. “ISIL will not pose an existential threat to us,” Obama said, as though anyone argues differently. “They are a dangerous organization like al Qaeda was, but we have hardened our defenses. The American people should feel confident that, you know, we are going to be able to defend ourselves and make sure that, you know, we have a good holiday and go about our lives.”

The interview was taped simultaneously with the investigation into the San Bernardino shootings on Wednesday.

The level of disconnect here truly rises to the level of astonishing. We know that President Obama has lied about national security repeatedly in order to ensure his own political popularity – and we know he’s done so specifically with regard to ISIS. On Monday, his former intelligence head openly explained that Obama ignored intelligence about ISIS’ rise in 2011 and 2012 to boost his re-election chances. Now, Obama’s openly lying to us about our level of safety in order to protect his own prioritization of climate change.


[img=0x0]http://cat.ny.us.criteo.com/delivery/lg.php?cppv=1&cpp=221eE3w4VzNCSHdZWU5IK1h3a1RnU2dISG5reWFSK0pOS1Z6bFFNN1lualNsVmFaaW5oa1p3WXZTWXpHQ0t1TjQ4YTdJWDhyaWVXZGQySTFNS0ZnUTF6UG9UeS80NU5nUTQ3UGY1a2QwN2Q1QWRXblI0Q1R5QUNWRzVrSE1Gbzg5RGdQV1pJQU1yejNaZVFhekordGlGMjNNZUJYb08ydm5WWi8yZmFPeWRCZktXWFFmL3ZQK01ZWUZMUy9DZGFnNGhRZzZMOTNlWVJQRVVDWEpSWXFpai8wb0pYNWRKMHJyRTlBOGJsK2xGUEZsWDZZPXw%3D[/img][img=0x0]http://track.adform.net/serving/cookie/match/?party=12&redirect=http%3a%2f%2fdis.criteo.com%2frex%2fmatch.aspx%3fc%3d16%26uid%3d%25%25USER_ID%25%25[/img]

Absolutely incredible.

Just to ensure that Americans feel perfectly safe against ISIS, Obama has pledged to move strongly on gun control. Today, the White House announced that Obama’s desire to strengthen anti-gun regulation would actually deter terrorism. Fox News’ Peter Doocy asked, “Does the President really think that common sense gun laws would deter terrorists now that he has admitted that these two may have been terrorists?” Josh Earnest answered, “Yes.”

Just like climate change summits intimidate ISIS. Just like ISIS was jayvee.
You’re not safe under President Obama’s watch. That’s because he’s not watching. He’s just covering his own ass, forever and always.

[tvguy]

A rough day at the office equals your wife joining you in shooting up your work place? Yea, don't think so, that in and of itself rules out the workplace violence MO. This was in no way shape or form workplace violence, unless of course you need to fill a narrative, aside from that this was pure unadulterated muslim terrorism that took place at his place of employment because it was an easy hit and he knew the variables, facility and vicinity. To call this work place violence is the biggest perversion of the truth.....this week.

OK WHO is calling this workplace violence?? I'm watching the news and they just got through saying these people were Radicalized inspired by some middle easterns...

In other words they may have been doing what they did as wanna be ISIS.. They believe in that crap.

It is believe that these people were inspired radical Islam by and acted out accordingly.

But these people startede at their OWN place of work so OF COURSE "work place violence" was a possible motive or PART of the motive.



But as usual the right wing idiots want to say there is some kind of cover up because Obama didn't sat this was DEFINITELY terrorism ONE SECOND after it happened.


WHAT COVER UP???????????

[orygunluvr]

A rough day at the office equals your wife joining you in shooting up your work place? Yea, don't think so, that in and of itself rules out the workplace violence MO. This was in no way shape or form workplace violence, unless of course you need to fill a narrative, aside from that this was pure unadulterated muslim terrorism that took place at his place of employment because it was an easy hit and he knew the variables, facility and vicinity. To call this work place violence is the biggest perversion of the truth.....this week.

OK WHO is calling this workplace violence?? I'm watching the news and they just got through saying these people were Radicalized inspired by some middle easterns...

In other words they may have been doing what they did as wanna be ISIS.. They believe in that crap.

It is believe that these people were inspired radical Islam by and acted out accordingly.

But these people startede at their OWN place of work so OF COURSE "work place violence" was a possible motive or PART of the motive.



But as usual the right wing idiots want to say there is some kind of cover up because Obama didn't sat this was DEFINITELY terrorism ONE SECOND after it happened.


WHAT COVER UP???????????

Obozo will NEVER EVER call it what it is, Islamic terrorism. Fort Hood was deemed workplace violence even though the shooter was openly waging jihad. You are getting dumber by the minute. You actually believe the new term "hybrid workplace jihad" created by one of your media mouthpieces, don't you.

[tvguy]

Dumber by the minute.....

http://www.dailywire.com/news/1585/obama-said-americans-safe-isis-style-attack-while-ben-shapiro?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_content=120315-news&utm_campaign=

Obama Said Americans Safe From ISIS-Style Attack -- While Police Hunted San Bernardino Terrorists!
President Obama’s universe must be a wonderful place.

President Obama’s universe must be a wonderful place.

It sure isn’t reality.

In an interview with CNN that aired on Thursday – the day after reportedly ISIS-inspired radical Muslim terrorists murdered 14 people in San Bernardino, California – Obama explained that Americans were safe from ISIS attack like the Paris attacks. “ISIL will not pose an existential threat to us,” Obama said, as though anyone argues differently. “They are a dangerous organization like al Qaeda was, but we have hardened our defenses. The American people should feel confident that, you know, we are going to be able to defend ourselves and make sure that, you know, we have a good holiday and go about our lives.”

The interview was taped simultaneously with the investigation into the San Bernardino shootings on Wednesday.

The level of disconnect here truly rises to the level of astonishing. We know that President Obama has lied about national security repeatedly in order to ensure his own political popularity – and we know he’s done so specifically with regard to ISIS. On Monday, his former intelligence head openly explained that Obama ignored intelligence about ISIS’ rise in 2011 and 2012 to boost his re-election chances. Now, Obama’s openly lying to us about our level of safety in order to protect his own prioritization of climate change.


[img=0x0]http://cat.ny.us.criteo.com/delivery/lg.php?cppv=1&cpp=221eE3w4VzNCSHdZWU5IK1h3a1RnU2dISG5reWFSK0pOS1Z6bFFNN1lualNsVmFaaW5oa1p3WXZTWXpHQ0t1TjQ4YTdJWDhyaWVXZGQySTFNS0ZnUTF6UG9UeS80NU5nUTQ3UGY1a2QwN2Q1QWRXblI0Q1R5QUNWRzVrSE1Gbzg5RGdQV1pJQU1yejNaZVFhekordGlGMjNNZUJYb08ydm5WWi8yZmFPeWRCZktXWFFmL3ZQK01ZWUZMUy9DZGFnNGhRZzZMOTNlWVJQRVVDWEpSWXFpai8wb0pYNWRKMHJyRTlBOGJsK2xGUEZsWDZZPXw%3D[/img][img=0x0]http://track.adform.net/serving/cookie/match/?party=12&redirect=http%3a%2f%2fdis.criteo.com%2frex%2fmatch.aspx%3fc%3d16%26uid%3d%25%25USER_ID%25%25[/img]

Absolutely incredible.

Just to ensure that Americans feel perfectly safe against ISIS, Obama has pledged to move strongly on gun control. Today, the White House announced that Obama’s desire to strengthen anti-gun regulation would actually deter terrorism. Fox News’ Peter Doocy asked, “Does the President really think that common sense gun laws would deter terrorists now that he has admitted that these two may have been terrorists?” Josh Earnest answered, “Yes.”

Just like climate change summits intimidate ISIS. Just like ISIS was jayvee.
You’re not safe under President Obama’s watch. That’s because he’s not watching. He’s just covering his own ass, forever and always.

MORE LIES from OL ...  ""Obama Said Americans Safe From ISIS-Style Attack""
Is that what he said?? here is what he said.......


"ISIL will not pose an existential threat to us. They are a dangerous organization like al Qaeda was, but we have hardened our defenses," Obama told CBS. "The American people should feel confident that, you know, we are going to be able to defend ourselves and make sure that, you know, we have a good holiday and go about our lives."

 Did Obama say we are safe from AMERICANS who become radicalized from the militant Islamic's?

Does "feel confident" equal being "safe"?



 

[orygunluvr]

[orygunluvr]

These are what's called F A C T S, in picture form so you guys can 
u n d e r s t a n d

[Cuzz]

These are what's called F A C T S, in picture form so you guys can 
u n d e r s t a n d

So, you're a cop hater too? I usually ignore your posts so maybe you've been one all along and I just didn't notice. So, what does that make you? A radical libertarian? Anarchist? What?

[orygunluvr]

These are what's called F A C T S, in picture form so you guys can 
u n d e r s t a n d

So, you're a cop hater too? I usually ignore your posts so maybe you've been one all along and I just didn't notice. So, what does that make you? A radical libertarian? Anarchist? What?

Didn't know posting the gun laws libs love made me a cop hater. Oh well ignore me some more if you can't make a little sense. 

[GPnative]

A rough day at the office equals your wife joining you in shooting up your work place? Yea, don't think so, that in and of itself rules out the workplace violence MO. This was in no way shape or form workplace violence, unless of course you need to fill a narrative, aside from that this was pure unadulterated muslim terrorism that took place at his place of employment because it was an easy hit and he knew the variables, facility and vicinity. To call this work place violence is the biggest perversion of the truth.....this week.

OK WHO is calling this workplace violence?? I'm watching the news and they just got through saying these people were Radicalized inspired by some middle easterns...

In other words they may have been doing what they did as wanna be ISIS.. They believe in that crap.

It is believe that these people were inspired radical Islam by and acted out accordingly.

But these people startede at their OWN place of work so OF COURSE "work place violence" was a possible motive or PART of the motive.



But as usual the right wing idiots want to say there is some kind of cover up because Obama didn't sat this was DEFINITELY terrorism ONE SECOND after it happened.


WHAT COVER UP???????????

I still use print media AP type articles as my benchmark. The internet has so many news sites that you can find any article to suit your taste. So, based on local print media Mail Trib and Courier, both newspapers have completely glossed over the terrorism link and instead are vague at best regarding the evidence of them being radicalized, the Courier article was definitely bent towards it likely being tied to workplace violence, rage, multiple motives, etc. It's disgusting really that they can't call a spade a spade, and that's the cover up, at least report on the facts known up to this point which clearly point towards terrorism, so who cares that it took place where they worked or at some other public venue, the fact remains it was terrorism and they were hell bent on killing as many innocents as possible. The headline of the day should of been "TERRORISM STRIKES CALIFORNIA" instead they go with "Carnage in California"