Join The Resistance
(01-24-2017, 09:36 PM)Wonky3 Wrote:
(01-24-2017, 07:30 PM)Cuzz Wrote:
(01-24-2017, 07:26 PM)GPnative Wrote:
(01-24-2017, 07:21 PM)Cuzz Wrote: What's a courier?

GP daily courier newspaper

Oh... thanks.

Yep...The Grants Pass Daily Courier sent a journalist accross the breadth of our great land and sifted through all the data that was collected reporting the millions of people who voted. 
OR...
The Grants Pass Daily Courier (most likely) picked up a report from another source and repeated it. 
What de DON'T know is the source. We know it was not a reliable source because:

What we do know is that many national news organizatons, after looking at the collected data, has reported that about 2.9 more voters chose Mrs. Clinton than Mr. Trump. 

Still...Mr. Trump is the legitimate winner, and rightful president of these United States of America. We understand the popular vote is of no real significance unless it also brings with it the electoral vote. 

The report from the Grants Pass Daily Courier? Really?   I mean seriously?  Embarrassed

And the great wonky has sifted through every know news source confirmed the accuracy or inaccuracy of said news source and then complied a complete list of all figures and then ran a average which has proved the courier source to be not credible. You are a busy man!!!! My hat is off to you. Cheers.

Sent from my SM-G920R4 using Tapatalk
Reply
(01-24-2017, 10:06 PM)capitalist pig Wrote:
(01-24-2017, 09:36 PM)Wonky3 Wrote:
(01-24-2017, 07:30 PM)Cuzz Wrote:
(01-24-2017, 07:26 PM)GPnative Wrote:
(01-24-2017, 07:21 PM)Cuzz Wrote: What's a courier?

GP daily courier newspaper

Oh... thanks.

Yep...The Grants Pass Daily Courier sent a journalist accross the breadth of our great land and sifted through all the data that was collected reporting the millions of people who voted. 
OR...
The Grants Pass Daily Courier (most likely) picked up a report from another source and repeated it. 
What de DON'T know is the source. We know it was not a reliable source because:

What we do know is that many national news organizatons, after looking at the collected data, has reported that about 2.9 more voters chose Mrs. Clinton than Mr. Trump. 

Still...Mr. Trump is the legitimate winner, and rightful president of these United States of America. We understand the popular vote is of no real significance unless it also brings with it the electoral vote. 

The report from the Grants Pass Daily Courier? Really?   I mean seriously?  Embarrassed

And the great wonky has sifted through every know news source confirmed the accuracy or inaccuracy of said news source and then complied a complete list of all figures and then ran a average which has proved the courier source to be not credible. You are a busy man!!!!  My hat is off to you. Cheers.  

Sent from my SM-G920R4 using Tapatalk

I read. Therefore, I am.  Smiling
But: Argure the point. Who (what) was the source in the GP Paper? Careless and unforgiving of you not to include that since you accept it as fact. 
ALL the national news sources reported the facts we have repeated here. 
(By the way, what kind of hat do you wear?)
Reply
(01-24-2017, 09:36 PM)Wonky3 Wrote:
(01-24-2017, 07:30 PM)Cuzz Wrote:
(01-24-2017, 07:26 PM)GPnative Wrote:
(01-24-2017, 07:21 PM)Cuzz Wrote: What's a courier?

GP daily courier newspaper

Oh... thanks.

Yep...The Grants Pass Daily Courier sent a journalist accross the breadth of our great land and sifted through all the data that was collected reporting the millions of people who voted. 
OR...
The Grants Pass Daily Courier (most likely) picked up a report from another source and repeated it. 
What de DON'T know is the source. We know it was not a reliable source because:

What we do know is that many national news organizatons, after looking at the collected data, has reported that about 2.9 more voters chose Mrs. Clinton than Mr. Trump. 

Still...Mr. Trump is the legitimate winner, and rightful president of these United States of America. We understand the popular vote is of no real significance unless it also brings with it the electoral vote. 

The report from the Grants Pass Daily Courier? Really?  Laughing I mean seriously?  Embarrassed

Holy shit, really?? This place is beyond tedious. It was an AP article picked up by the courier.. I did not say the courier reported anything. So you tell me who the hell is lying, is it the AP?? Or is it your crappy unnamed sources?? Or is the TRUTH that no one really has any damn idea and its just one big gusss with the number increasing depending on who reports and the agenda they are pushing.

AND now for the the coup de gra

Go back and reread the thread and replies I was replying to, it was about the gawd damn women's march NOT the gawd damn election results, please try to keep up!
Reply
(01-24-2017, 10:16 PM)Wonky3 Wrote:
(01-24-2017, 10:06 PM)capitalist pig Wrote:
(01-24-2017, 09:36 PM)Wonky3 Wrote:
(01-24-2017, 07:30 PM)Cuzz Wrote:
(01-24-2017, 07:26 PM)GPnative Wrote: GP daily courier newspaper

Oh... thanks.

Yep...The Grants Pass Daily Courier sent a journalist accross the breadth of our great land and sifted through all the data that was collected reporting the millions of people who voted. 
OR...
The Grants Pass Daily Courier (most likely) picked up a report from another source and repeated it. 
What de DON'T know is the source. We know it was not a reliable source because:

What we do know is that many national news organizatons, after looking at the collected data, has reported that about 2.9 more voters chose Mrs. Clinton than Mr. Trump. 

Still...Mr. Trump is the legitimate winner, and rightful president of these United States of America. We understand the popular vote is of no real significance unless it also brings with it the electoral vote. 

The report from the Grants Pass Daily Courier? Really?   I mean seriously?  Embarrassed

And the great wonky has sifted through every know news source confirmed the accuracy or inaccuracy of said news source and then complied a complete list of all figures and then ran a average which has proved the courier source to be not credible. You are a busy man!!!!  My hat is off to you. Cheers.  

Sent from my SM-G920R4 using Tapatalk

I read. Therefore, I am.  Smiling
But: Argure the point. Who (what) was the source in the GP Paper? Careless and unforgiving of you not to include that since you accept it as fact. 
ALL the national news sources reported the facts we have repeated here. 
(By the way, what kind of hat do you wear?)
Where did I say I accept as fact? The only person that went with any " facts " was you.

Sent from my SM-G920R4 using Tapatalk
Reply
(01-24-2017, 10:33 PM)capitalist pig Wrote:
(01-24-2017, 10:16 PM)Wonky3 Wrote:
(01-24-2017, 10:06 PM)capitalist pig Wrote:
(01-24-2017, 09:36 PM)Wonky3 Wrote:
(01-24-2017, 07:30 PM)Cuzz Wrote: Oh... thanks.

Yep...The Grants Pass Daily Courier sent a journalist accross the breadth of our great land and sifted through all the data that was collected reporting the millions of people who voted. 
OR...
The Grants Pass Daily Courier (most likely) picked up a report from another source and repeated it. 
What de DON'T know is the source. We know it was not a reliable source because:

What we do know is that many national news organizatons, after looking at the collected data, has reported that about 2.9 more voters chose Mrs. Clinton than Mr. Trump. 

Still...Mr. Trump is the legitimate winner, and rightful president of these United States of America. We understand the popular vote is of no real significance unless it also brings with it the electoral vote. 

The report from the Grants Pass Daily Courier? Really?   I mean seriously?  Embarrassed

And the great wonky has sifted through every know news source confirmed the accuracy or inaccuracy of said news source and then complied a complete list of all figures and then ran a average which has proved the courier source to be not credible. You are a busy man!!!!  My hat is off to you. Cheers.  

Sent from my SM-G920R4 using Tapatalk

I read. Therefore, I am.  Smiling
But: Argure the point. Who (what) was the source in the GP Paper? Careless and unforgiving of you not to include that since you accept it as fact. 
ALL the national news sources reported the facts we have repeated here. 
(By the way, what kind of hat do you wear?)
Where did I say I accept as fact? The only person that went with any " facts " was you.

Sent from my SM-G920R4 using Tapatalk

Clearly he is up past his bedtime, if he was any more lost on this thread he would need a search party.
Reply
(01-24-2017, 10:33 PM)capitalist pig Wrote:
(01-24-2017, 10:16 PM)Wonky3 Wrote:
(01-24-2017, 10:06 PM)capitalist pig Wrote:
(01-24-2017, 09:36 PM)Wonky3 Wrote:
(01-24-2017, 07:30 PM)Cuzz Wrote: Oh... thanks.

Yep...The Grants Pass Daily Courier sent a journalist accross the breadth of our great land and sifted through all the data that was collected reporting the millions of people who voted. 
OR...
The Grants Pass Daily Courier (most likely) picked up a report from another source and repeated it. 
What de DON'T know is the source. We know it was not a reliable source because:

What we do know is that many national news organizatons, after looking at the collected data, has reported that about 2.9 more voters chose Mrs. Clinton than Mr. Trump. 

Still...Mr. Trump is the legitimate winner, and rightful president of these United States of America. We understand the popular vote is of no real significance unless it also brings with it the electoral vote. 

The report from the Grants Pass Daily Courier? Really?   I mean seriously?  Embarrassed

And the great wonky has sifted through every know news source confirmed the accuracy or inaccuracy of said news source and then complied a complete list of all figures and then ran a average which has proved the courier source to be not credible. You are a busy man!!!!  My hat is off to you. Cheers.  

Sent from my SM-G920R4 using Tapatalk

I read. Therefore, I am.  Smiling
But: Argure the point. Who (what) was the source in the GP Paper? Careless and unforgiving of you not to include that since you accept it as fact. 
ALL the national news sources reported the facts we have repeated here. 
(By the way, what kind of hat do you wear?)
Where did I say I accept as fact? The only person that went with any " facts " was you.

Sent from my SM-G920R4 using Tapatalk

They could be those alternative facts.
Reply
(01-24-2017, 10:30 PM)GPnative Wrote:
(01-24-2017, 09:36 PM)Wonky3 Wrote:
(01-24-2017, 07:30 PM)Cuzz Wrote:
(01-24-2017, 07:26 PM)GPnative Wrote:
(01-24-2017, 07:21 PM)Cuzz Wrote: What's a courier?

GP daily courier newspaper

Oh... thanks.

Yep...The Grants Pass Daily Courier sent a journalist accross the breadth of our great land and sifted through all the data that was collected reporting the millions of people who voted. 
OR...
The Grants Pass Daily Courier (most likely) picked up a report from another source and repeated it. 
What de DON'T know is the source. We know it was not a reliable source because:

What we do know is that many national news organizatons, after looking at the collected data, has reported that about 2.9 more voters chose Mrs. Clinton than Mr. Trump. 

Still...Mr. Trump is the legitimate winner, and rightful president of these United States of America. We understand the popular vote is of no real significance unless it also brings with it the electoral vote. 

The report from the Grants Pass Daily Courier? Really?  Laughing I mean seriously?  Embarrassed

Holy shit, really?? This place is beyond tedious. It was an AP article picked up by the courier.. I did not say the courier reported anything. So you tell me who the hell is lying, is it the AP?? Or is it your crappy unnamed sources?? Or is the TRUTH that no one really has any damn idea and its just one big gusss with the number increasing depending on who reports and the agenda they are pushing.

AND now for the the coup de gra

Go back and reread the thread and replies I was replying to, it was about the gawd damn women's march NOT the gawd damn election results, please try to keep up!

What's up Wonky, no reply to my previous post and re-quoted here? No usual crow eating Wonky reply playing the doddering old internet fool for jumping into a conversation without even understanding the discussion at hand??  No comment about you spouting as fact a number pulled from Cletus' ass about a completely different subject? No comment about you condemning the Courier as NOT RELIABLE for using an AP source but you go on to say other national sources are reliable, with the critical point being you flipped the subject to a completely different topic with said numbers??  All this from the forums self proclaimed newspaper expert condemning the Courier as not not reliable for running an AP article about a topic that went completely over your head.

Careful, your true colors of picking and choosing your facts as you want them is showing.....
Reply
(01-25-2017, 09:22 AM)GPnative Wrote:
(01-24-2017, 10:30 PM)GPnative Wrote:
(01-24-2017, 09:36 PM)Wonky3 Wrote:
(01-24-2017, 07:30 PM)Cuzz Wrote:
(01-24-2017, 07:26 PM)GPnative Wrote: GP daily courier newspaper

Oh... thanks.

Yep...The Grants Pass Daily Courier sent a journalist accross the breadth of our great land and sifted through all the data that was collected reporting the millions of people who voted. 
OR...
The Grants Pass Daily Courier (most likely) picked up a report from another source and repeated it. 
What de DON'T know is the source. We know it was not a reliable source because:

What we do know is that many national news organizatons, after looking at the collected data, has reported that about 2.9 more voters chose Mrs. Clinton than Mr. Trump. 

Still...Mr. Trump is the legitimate winner, and rightful president of these United States of America. We understand the popular vote is of no real significance unless it also brings with it the electoral vote. 

The report from the Grants Pass Daily Courier? Really?  Laughing I mean seriously?  Embarrassed

Holy shit, really?? This place is beyond tedious. It was an AP article picked up by the courier.. I did not say the courier reported anything. So you tell me who the hell is lying, is it the AP?? Or is it your crappy unnamed sources?? Or is the TRUTH that no one really has any damn idea and its just one big gusss with the number increasing depending on who reports and the agenda they are pushing.

AND now for the the coup de gra

Go back and reread the thread and replies I was replying to, it was about the gawd damn women's march NOT the gawd damn election results, please try to keep up!

What's up Wonky, no reply to my previous post and re-quoted here? No usual crow eating Wonky reply playing the doddering old internet fool for jumping into a conversation without even understanding the discussion at hand??  No comment about you spouting as fact a number pulled from Cletus' ass about a completely different subject? No comment about you condemning the Courier as NOT RELIABLE for using an AP source but you go on to say other national sources are reliable, with the critical point being you flipped the subject to a completely different topic with said numbers??  All this from the forums self proclaimed newspaper expert condemning the Courier as not not reliable for running an AP article about a topic that went completely over your head.

Careful, your true colors of picking and choosing your facts as you want them is showing.....

When you're right, your're right. I was not paying attention and when I saw the 3.2 million number in GP Native's post about the report in the GP paper, I jumped on it as the number Mr. Trump has said was a fraudulent count of Mrs. Clinton's popular vote. I see now, it was in reference to the "Womans March" and am embarrased I did not pay more attention.

You are correct in saying I was "choosing my own facts" and I regret the mistake.
Reply
(01-25-2017, 03:14 PM)Wonky3 Wrote:
(01-25-2017, 09:22 AM)GPnative Wrote:
(01-24-2017, 10:30 PM)GPnative Wrote:
(01-24-2017, 09:36 PM)Wonky3 Wrote:
(01-24-2017, 07:30 PM)Cuzz Wrote: Oh... thanks.

Yep...The Grants Pass Daily Courier sent a journalist accross the breadth of our great land and sifted through all the data that was collected reporting the millions of people who voted. 
OR...
The Grants Pass Daily Courier (most likely) picked up a report from another source and repeated it. 
What de DON'T know is the source. We know it was not a reliable source because:

What we do know is that many national news organizatons, after looking at the collected data, has reported that about 2.9 more voters chose Mrs. Clinton than Mr. Trump. 

Still...Mr. Trump is the legitimate winner, and rightful president of these United States of America. We understand the popular vote is of no real significance unless it also brings with it the electoral vote. 

The report from the Grants Pass Daily Courier? Really?  Laughing I mean seriously?  Embarrassed

Holy shit, really?? This place is beyond tedious. It was an AP article picked up by the courier.. I did not say the courier reported anything. So you tell me who the hell is lying, is it the AP?? Or is it your crappy unnamed sources?? Or is the TRUTH that no one really has any damn idea and its just one big gusss with the number increasing depending on who reports and the agenda they are pushing.

AND now for the the coup de gra

Go back and reread the thread and replies I was replying to, it was about the gawd damn women's march NOT the gawd damn election results, please try to keep up!

What's up Wonky, no reply to my previous post and re-quoted here? No usual crow eating Wonky reply playing the doddering old internet fool for jumping into a conversation without even understanding the discussion at hand??  No comment about you spouting as fact a number pulled from Cletus' ass about a completely different subject? No comment about you condemning the Courier as NOT RELIABLE for using an AP source but you go on to say other national sources are reliable, with the critical point being you flipped the subject to a completely different topic with said numbers??  All this from the forums self proclaimed newspaper expert condemning the Courier as not not reliable for running an AP article about a topic that went completely over your head.

Careful, your true colors of picking and choosing your facts as you want them is showing.....

When you're right, your're right. I was not paying attention and when I saw the 3.2 million number in GP Native's post about the report in the GP paper, I jumped on it as the number Mr. Trump has said was a fraudulent count of Mrs. Clinton's popular vote. I see now, it was in reference to the "Womans March" and am embarrased I did not pay more attention.

You are correct in saying I was "choosing my own facts" and I regret the mistake.

OK Mr's Now Get down and give me TWEN...... er ONE!!!! Razz
Reply
(01-25-2017, 05:15 PM)tvguy Wrote:
(01-25-2017, 03:14 PM)Wonky3 Wrote:
(01-25-2017, 09:22 AM)GPnative Wrote:
(01-24-2017, 10:30 PM)GPnative Wrote:
(01-24-2017, 09:36 PM)Wonky3 Wrote: Yep...The Grants Pass Daily Courier sent a journalist accross the breadth of our great land and sifted through all the data that was collected reporting the millions of people who voted. 
OR...
The Grants Pass Daily Courier (most likely) picked up a report from another source and repeated it. 
What de DON'T know is the source. We know it was not a reliable source because:

What we do know is that many national news organizatons, after looking at the collected data, has reported that about 2.9 more voters chose Mrs. Clinton than Mr. Trump. 

Still...Mr. Trump is the legitimate winner, and rightful president of these United States of America. We understand the popular vote is of no real significance unless it also brings with it the electoral vote. 

The report from the Grants Pass Daily Courier? Really?  Laughing I mean seriously?  Embarrassed

Holy shit, really?? This place is beyond tedious. It was an AP article picked up by the courier.. I did not say the courier reported anything. So you tell me who the hell is lying, is it the AP?? Or is it your crappy unnamed sources?? Or is the TRUTH that no one really has any damn idea and its just one big gusss with the number increasing depending on who reports and the agenda they are pushing.

AND now for the the coup de gra

Go back and reread the thread and replies I was replying to, it was about the gawd damn women's march NOT the gawd damn election results, please try to keep up!

What's up Wonky, no reply to my previous post and re-quoted here? No usual crow eating Wonky reply playing the doddering old internet fool for jumping into a conversation without even understanding the discussion at hand??  No comment about you spouting as fact a number pulled from Cletus' ass about a completely different subject? No comment about you condemning the Courier as NOT RELIABLE for using an AP source but you go on to say other national sources are reliable, with the critical point being you flipped the subject to a completely different topic with said numbers??  All this from the forums self proclaimed newspaper expert condemning the Courier as not not reliable for running an AP article about a topic that went completely over your head.

Careful, your true colors of picking and choosing your facts as you want them is showing.....

When you're right, your're right. I was not paying attention and when I saw the 3.2 million number in GP Native's post about the report in the GP paper, I jumped on it as the number Mr. Trump has said was a fraudulent count of Mrs. Clinton's popular vote. I see now, it was in reference to the "Womans March" and am embarrased I did not pay more attention.

You are correct in saying I was "choosing my own facts" and I regret the mistake.

OK Mr's Now Get down and give me TWEN...... er ONE!!!! Razz

Sure, I gave "give you one". Bent knee and half way up. Then oxygen.
Reply
Oxygen ?
You are getting soft in your old age
Reply
Big Grin

[Image: -6a0b73d56211c687.jpg]
Reply
(01-29-2017, 01:05 PM)Valuesize Wrote: Big Grin

[Image: -6a0b73d56211c687.jpg]

So?
What to add a bit of text?
Reply
Here's a list of Presidents that have banned people from entering the USA:

Chester Authur - Republican
Calvin Coolidge - Republican
Theodore Roosevelt - Republican
Franklin D Roosevelt - Democrat
US Congress (Dems Controlled both houses) 1917 banned Asians /Pacific Islanders until 1952 Congress passed, President Woodrow Wilson (Democrat) vetoed, Congress over rode veto)
Jimmy Carter - Democrat
Ronald Reagan (5 times)- Republican
George W. Bush - Republican
Bill Clinton (6 times) - Democrat
Barack Obama - Democrat
Donald Trump - Republican
Reply
(01-29-2017, 01:22 PM)Hugo Wrote: Here's a list of Presidents that have banned people from entering the USA:

Chester Authur - Republican
Calvin Coolidge - Republican
Theodore Roosevelt - Republican
Franklin D Roosevelt - Democrat
US Congress (Dems Controlled both houses) 1917 banned Asians /Pacific Islanders until 1952 Congress passed, President Woodrow Wilson (Democrat) vetoed, Congress over rode veto)
Jimmy Carter - Democrat
Ronald Reagan (5 times)- Republican
George W. Bush - Republican
Bill Clinton (6 times) - Democrat
Barack Obama - Democrat
Donald Trump - Republican

...and your point?
Reply
Off we go.....  Big Grin

http://www.portlandmercury.com/blogtown/...dx-airport

[Image: 1485716391-c3tsrkrucae7ega.jpg]
Reply
(01-29-2017, 01:50 PM)Valuesize Wrote: Off we go.....  Big Grin

http://www.portlandmercury.com/blogtown/...dx-airport

[Image: 1485716391-c3tsrkrucae7ega.jpg]
Living the lies your handlers want you to live, perfect loon libs.
Reply
(01-29-2017, 01:43 PM)Wonky3 Wrote:
(01-29-2017, 01:22 PM)Hugo Wrote: Here's a list of Presidents that have banned people from entering the USA:

Chester Authur - Republican
Calvin Coolidge - Republican
Theodore Roosevelt - Republican
Franklin D Roosevelt - Democrat
US Congress (Dems Controlled both houses) 1917 banned Asians /Pacific Islanders until 1952 Congress passed, President Woodrow Wilson (Democrat) vetoed, Congress over rode veto)
Jimmy Carter - Democrat
Ronald Reagan (5 times)- Republican
George W. Bush - Republican
Bill Clinton (6 times) - Democrat
Barack Obama - Democrat
Donald Trump - Republican

...and your point?

He doesn't have one. Not one that makes sense anyway. I fail to see how what Obama did has ANYTHING to do with what Trump did.





President Barack Obama has used the authority this statute provides six times in his tenure. In July 2011, Obama barred the entry of “anyone under a UN travel ban; anyone who violates any of 29 executive orders regarding transactions with terrorists, those who undermine the democratic process in specific countries, or transnational criminal organizations.”
In April of 2012, he barred the entry of anyone “facilitating computer or network disruption that could assist in or enable serious human rights abuses by or on behalf of the government of Iran and Syria; anyone who have sold or provided goods, services, or technology to Iran or Syria likely to be used for such purposes; or to have materially assisted anyone whose property or interests are described.”

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2016/06/16/the-past-six-presidents-have-all-used-executive-power-to-block-certain-classes-of-immigrants/#ixzz4XBfCjGo8
Reply
(01-29-2017, 02:10 PM)tvguy Wrote:
(01-29-2017, 01:43 PM)Wonky3 Wrote:
(01-29-2017, 01:22 PM)Hugo Wrote: Here's a list of Presidents that have banned people from entering the USA:

Chester Authur - Republican
Calvin Coolidge - Republican
Theodore Roosevelt - Republican
Franklin D Roosevelt - Democrat
US Congress (Dems Controlled both houses) 1917 banned Asians /Pacific Islanders until 1952 Congress passed, President Woodrow Wilson (Democrat) vetoed, Congress over rode veto)
Jimmy Carter - Democrat
Ronald Reagan (5 times)- Republican
George W. Bush - Republican
Bill Clinton (6 times) - Democrat
Barack Obama - Democrat
Donald Trump - Republican

...and your point?

He doesn't have one. Not one that makes sense anyway. I fail to see how what Obama did has ANYTHING to do with what Trump did.





President Barack Obama has used the authority this statute provides six times in his tenure. In July 2011, Obama barred the entry of “anyone under a UN travel ban; anyone who violates any of 29 executive orders regarding transactions with terrorists, those who undermine the democratic process in specific countries, or transnational criminal organizations.”
In April of 2012, he barred the entry of anyone “facilitating computer or network disruption that could assist in or enable serious human rights abuses by or on behalf of the government of Iran and Syria; anyone who have sold or provided goods, services, or technology to Iran or Syria likely to be used for such purposes; or to have materially assisted anyone whose property or interests are described.”

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2016/06/16/the-past-six-presidents-have-all-used-executive-power-to-block-certain-classes-of-immigrants/#ixzz4XBfCjGo8

In their cross wired brains it's exactly the same. It's not.
Reply
(01-29-2017, 01:56 PM)orygunluvr Wrote:
(01-29-2017, 01:50 PM)Valuesize Wrote: Off we go.....  Big Grin

http://www.portlandmercury.com/blogtown/...dx-airport

[Image: 1485716391-c3tsrkrucae7ega.jpg]
Living the lies your handlers want you to live, perfect loon libs.
At one time I thought of you as a "one trick pony". I'm thinking now you have no tricks.

In the name of all that's holy, SAY something! So far, you have proven to be a second class reactionary, never offering original or interesting content. 

You are taking up space. You don't deserve it.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)