Test
#1
====
Reply
#2
(06-26-2018, 10:16 AM)SFLiberal Wrote: ====

||
||
||
||
Reply
#3
(06-26-2018, 10:23 PM)chuck white Wrote:
(06-26-2018, 10:16 AM)SFLiberal Wrote: ====

||
||
||
||

Big Grin Big Grin
Reply
#4
000000000
Reply
#5
01010011 01000110 01001100 01101001 01100010 01100101 01110010 01100001 01101100 00100000 01100110 01100001 01101001 01101100 01100101 01100100 00100000 01101000 01101001 01110011 00100000 01110100 01100101 01110011 01110100

Smiling
Reply
#6
(06-27-2018, 10:58 AM)Cuzz Wrote: 01010011 01000110 01001100 01101001 01100010 01100101 01110010 01100001 01101100 00100000 01100110 01100001 01101001 01101100 01100101 01100100 00100000 01101000 01101001 01110011 00100000 01110100 01100101 01110011 01110100

Smiling

That is a lot of numbers for just four words.  Smiling
Reply
#7
(06-27-2018, 11:02 AM)Valuesize Wrote:
(06-27-2018, 10:58 AM)Cuzz Wrote: 01010011 01000110 01001100 01101001 01100010 01100101 01110010 01100001 01101100 00100000 01100110 01100001 01101001 01101100 01100101 01100100 00100000 01101000 01101001 01110011 00100000 01110100 01100101 01110011 01110100

Smiling

That is a lot of numbers for just four words.  Smiling

Didn't seem to slow you up at all though.   Big Grin
Reply
#8
(06-27-2018, 11:05 AM)Cuzz Wrote:
(06-27-2018, 11:02 AM)Valuesize Wrote:
(06-27-2018, 10:58 AM)Cuzz Wrote: 01010011 01000110 01001100 01101001 01100010 01100101 01110010 01100001 01101100 00100000 01100110 01100001 01101001 01101100 01100101 01100100 00100000 01101000 01101001 01110011 00100000 01110100 01100101 01110011 01110100

Smiling

That is a lot of numbers for just four words.  Smiling

Didn't seem to slow you up at all though.   Big Grin
At least all your efforts didn’t go for naught!
Reply
#9
Valuesize
(06-27-2018, 10:58 AM)Cuzz Wrote: 01010011 01000110 01001100 01101001 01100010 01100101 01110010 01100001 01101100 00100000 01100110 01100001 01101001 01101100 01100101 01100100 00100000 01101000 01101001 01110011 00100000 01110100 01100101 01110011 01110100

Smiling

That is a lot of numbers for just four words.  Smiling

Really though, it's only 10 numbers.  Geek
Reply
#10
(06-27-2018, 07:25 PM)Cuzz Wrote: Valuesize
(06-27-2018, 10:58 AM)Cuzz Wrote: 01010011 01000110 01001100 01101001 01100010 01100101 01110010 01100001 01101100 00100000 01100110 01100001 01101001 01101100 01100101 01100100 00100000 01101000 01101001 01110011 00100000 01110100 01100101 01110011 01110100

Smiling

That is a lot of numbers for just four words.  Smiling

Really though, it's only 10 numbers.  Geek

??? I only see two numbers. A 1 and a 0.
There are certainly a lot of digits.
Reply
#11
(06-27-2018, 10:08 PM)chuck white Wrote:
(06-27-2018, 07:25 PM)Cuzz Wrote: Valuesize
(06-27-2018, 10:58 AM)Cuzz Wrote: 01010011 01000110 01001100 01101001 01100010 01100101 01110010 01100001 01101100 00100000 01100110 01100001 01101001 01101100 01100101 01100100 00100000 01101000 01101001 01110011 00100000 01110100 01100101 01110011 01110100

Smiling

That is a lot of numbers for just four words.  Smiling

Really though, it's only 10 numbers.  Geek

??? I only see two numbers. A 1 and a 0.
There are certainly a lot of digits.

10=binary 2   Smiling
Reply
#12
Here's a question I stumbled across. Supposedly used by Amazon as an interview question. Don't know what it has to do with stuffing boxes but curious none the less. Use paper and pencil, calculator, fingers and toes, whatever you need.

And yes, I did get it right.

[Image: amazon-hanging-cable-problem-600.jpg?res...C338&ssl=1]
Reply
#13
(07-18-2018, 09:33 AM)Cuzz Wrote: Here's a question I stumbled across. Supposedly used by Amazon as an interview question. Don't know what it has to do with stuffing boxes but curious none the less. Use paper and pencil, calculator, fingers and toes, whatever you need.

And yes, I did get it right.

[Image: amazon-hanging-cable-problem-600.jpg?res...C338&ssl=1]

45 meters
Reply
#14
(07-18-2018, 09:33 AM)Cuzz Wrote: Here's a question I stumbled across. Supposedly used by Amazon as an interview question. Don't know what it has to do with stuffing boxes but curious none the less. Use paper and pencil, calculator, fingers and toes, whatever you need.

And yes, I did get it right.

[Image: amazon-hanging-cable-problem-600.jpg?res...C338&ssl=1]

The answer is zero.
Reply
#15
(07-18-2018, 01:05 PM)chuck white Wrote:
(07-18-2018, 09:33 AM)Cuzz Wrote: Here's a question I stumbled across. Supposedly used by Amazon as an interview question. Don't know what it has to do with stuffing boxes but curious none the less. Use paper and pencil, calculator, fingers and toes, whatever you need.

And yes, I did get it right.

[Image: amazon-hanging-cable-problem-600.jpg?res...C338&ssl=1]

The answer is zero.
Well I could have looked up the answer also.
Reply
#16
(07-18-2018, 01:05 PM)chuck white Wrote:
(07-18-2018, 09:33 AM)Cuzz Wrote: Here's a question I stumbled across. Supposedly used by Amazon as an interview question. Don't know what it has to do with stuffing boxes but curious none the less. Use paper and pencil, calculator, fingers and toes, whatever you need.

And yes, I did get it right.

[Image: amazon-hanging-cable-problem-600.jpg?res...C338&ssl=1]

The answer is zero.

Zero is the correct answer. The diagram is deceptive. The numbers draw a different picture.
Reply
#17
(07-18-2018, 03:56 PM)Cuzz Wrote:
(07-18-2018, 01:05 PM)chuck white Wrote:
(07-18-2018, 09:33 AM)Cuzz Wrote: Here's a question I stumbled across. Supposedly used by Amazon as an interview question. Don't know what it has to do with stuffing boxes but curious none the less. Use paper and pencil, calculator, fingers and toes, whatever you need.

And yes, I did get it right.

[Image: amazon-hanging-cable-problem-600.jpg?res...C338&ssl=1]

The answer is zero.

Zero is the correct answer. The diagram is deceptive. The numbers draw a different picture.
Yeah I know zero is the correct answer I looked it up. And yes the diagram is deceptive to say the least. More like a lie.
It's like I'm not supposed to believe what my lying eyes see.
Reply
#18
(07-18-2018, 04:16 PM)tvguy Wrote:
(07-18-2018, 03:56 PM)Cuzz Wrote:
(07-18-2018, 01:05 PM)chuck white Wrote:
(07-18-2018, 09:33 AM)Cuzz Wrote: Here's a question I stumbled across. Supposedly used by Amazon as an interview question. Don't know what it has to do with stuffing boxes but curious none the less. Use paper and pencil, calculator, fingers and toes, whatever you need.

And yes, I did get it right.

[Image: amazon-hanging-cable-problem-600.jpg?res...C338&ssl=1]

The answer is zero.

Zero is the correct answer. The diagram is deceptive. The numbers draw a different picture.
Yeah I know zero is the correct answer I looked it up. And yes the diagram is deceptive to say the least. More like a lie.
It's like I'm not supposed to believe what my lying eyes see.

Like a trick question. I've taken licensing tests that had just as tricky questions.
Reply
#19
(07-18-2018, 04:33 PM)Cuzz Wrote:
(07-18-2018, 04:16 PM)tvguy Wrote:
(07-18-2018, 03:56 PM)Cuzz Wrote:
(07-18-2018, 01:05 PM)chuck white Wrote:
(07-18-2018, 09:33 AM)Cuzz Wrote: Here's a question I stumbled across. Supposedly used by Amazon as an interview question. Don't know what it has to do with stuffing boxes but curious none the less. Use paper and pencil, calculator, fingers and toes, whatever you need.

And yes, I did get it right.

[Image: amazon-hanging-cable-problem-600.jpg?res...C338&ssl=1]

The answer is zero.

Zero is the correct answer. The diagram is deceptive. The numbers draw a different picture.
Yeah I know zero is the correct answer I looked it up. And yes the diagram is deceptive to say the least. More like a lie.
It's like I'm not supposed to believe what my lying eyes see.

Like a trick question. I've taken licensing tests that had just as tricky questions.

I've seen plenty of trick questions but not lying diagrams
Reply
#20
(07-18-2018, 05:00 PM)tvguy Wrote:
(07-18-2018, 04:33 PM)Cuzz Wrote:
(07-18-2018, 04:16 PM)tvguy Wrote:
(07-18-2018, 03:56 PM)Cuzz Wrote:
(07-18-2018, 01:05 PM)chuck white Wrote: The answer is zero.

Zero is the correct answer. The diagram is deceptive. The numbers draw a different picture.
Yeah I know zero is the correct answer I looked it up. And yes the diagram is deceptive to say the least. More like a lie.
It's like I'm not supposed to believe what my lying eyes see.

Like a trick question. I've taken licensing tests that had just as tricky questions.

I've seen plenty of trick questions but not lying diagrams

I didn't look it up. I saw the wire went down 40 feet from the top and to get back up would take another 40 feet. The cable is only 80 feet long, that leaves nothing left for a horizontal displacement.


Whoops, meters not feet.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)