Dedication of first ever Oregon police roadside memorial leads to I-5 crash
#1
This might be the last one, too: http://www.oregonlive.com/pacific-northw...crash.html

[Image: 9958453-large.jpg]

[Image: 9959129-large.jpg]

Excerpt: "The law of unintended consequences was on full display Thursday morning when two vehicles collided along Interstate 5, the drivers apparently distracted by a crowd of more than 100 people who'd gathered to honor three officers hit by a car at the same location 10 years ago.

"This is obviously the last thing we wanted," said Lt. Gregg Hastings, Oregon State Police public information officer. "It's a sad coincidence."

As wrecks go, it was a fender-bender: One driver sustained minor injuries, the other was treated and released, and the northbound lanes were closed for about 30 minutes.

The real damage, though, may have been in the public relations department. The irony of the situation wasn't lost on authorities, who scrambled to point out that the Oregon Department of Transportation used reader boards south of the site warning motorists to slow down.

But in truth, most any driver cruising along Interstate 5 north of Albany and near the Ankeny Hill exit would have turned into a bit of a rubbernecker.

Yes, we know we're supposed to keep on hands on the wheel and look straight ahead.

But if you see uniformed cops, patrol cars and motorcycles, fire trucks and TV mobile units all packed together on a gravel frontage road paralleling the highway – not 40 feet from the shoulder – you have to figure something big is going on.

Who wouldn't have a look-see?

And that's apparently what happened Thursday.

A pickup truck slowed.

A small station wagon following didn't.

The event was to honor two police officers killed in 2001 when they had stopped to help a family whose van had broken down. The driver of a pickup fell asleep at the wheel and his truck veered off the road. The truck hit a patrol car and slammed into the officers. Two died at the scene. Another was permanently injured.

On Thursday, a memorial at the site was to be dedicated and a sign alongside the interstate to be raised.

Press releases had been handed out, sound checks were made and the cameras were ready to roll when all eyes turned to the freeway at the sound of squealing brakes and the unmistakable sound of a crash.

Someone yelled "Oh, my God," and troopers and paramedics at the scene climbed over a barbed-wire fence and hustled to the station wagon to help the driver and stop traffic.

The wreck, Hastings, said, brought back "some bad thoughts for the families of Senior Trooper Maria Mignano and off-duty Albany Police Officer Jason Hoerauf, who had gathered for the memorial ceremony.

Memorial signs –white crosses on the side of the road, for example – are illegal along Oregon roads because they are distracting to motorists, said Dave Thompson, Oregon Department of Transportation spokesman.

"No one can put up a memorial on the side of a highway unless state law allows it," Thompson said. "The legislature created a law specifically for law enforcement, and this was the first sign."

Andy Olson, a former trooper and now in the Oregon House of Representatives, sponsored a bill in the last session that allows ODOT to create roadside memorials for officers killed in the line of duty. The sign erected Thursday bore Migano and Hoerauf's names. Another sign will be place about a mile away on the southbound side.

"Anything that distracts you from driving can be dangerous," Thompson said. "That said, every agency has to follow the law. That's what we did. We are not against this memorial at all. One of our chief executives was at the ceremony. Our sympathies are with the officers."

The ceremony did manage to go on, though authorities moved it about 100 yards away so emergency responders could deal with the accident.

Olson said the sign was a "fitting tribute" to the memory of the two officers who died. He said Thursday's wreck was a reminder that even with the best of precautions – he praised ODOT for having plenty of warning signs up –some wrecks just can't be prevented because drivers can be distracted for a variety of reasons.

Oregon State Police Superintendent Chris Brown said when law enforcement officers are asked why they choose the profession they usually say they want to serve someone other than themselves. He said the loss of any officer leaves an "ache in the heart" of not only the families, but the agency itself.

"When we travel this stretch of highway," he said, "we will think of them and their families."

The sign, he said, is a way to say "thank you," and a reminder that the officers have not been forgotten."
Reply
#2
I understand the memorial, but really? having 100 people show up alongside the highway for this event was a stupid idea..and look what happened
Reply
#3
(09-03-2011, 06:29 PM)isabella72 Wrote: I understand the memorial, but really? having 100 people show up alongside the highway for this event was a stupid idea..and look what happened

I agree but I don't understand the memorial. what's wrong with having memorials at cemeteries where the body is placed?
Why on earth is the place where people actually die the place to put a cross and flowers?

Reply
#4
(09-03-2011, 09:01 PM)tvguy Wrote:
(09-03-2011, 06:29 PM)isabella72 Wrote: I understand the memorial, but really? having 100 people show up alongside the highway for this event was a stupid idea..and look what happened

I agree but I don't understand the memorial. what's wrong with having memorials at cemeteries where the body is placed?
Why on earth is the place where people actually die the place to put a cross and flowers?

TV....I have never understood these roadside memorials either. Why would anyone want to memorialize the place someone died. I guess different strokes for different folks.
Reply
#5
(09-03-2011, 09:06 PM)Snowlover Wrote:
(09-03-2011, 09:01 PM)tvguy Wrote:
(09-03-2011, 06:29 PM)isabella72 Wrote: I understand the memorial, but really? having 100 people show up alongside the highway for this event was a stupid idea..and look what happened

I agree but I don't understand the memorial. what's wrong with having memorials at cemeteries where the body is placed?
Why on earth is the place where people actually die the place to put a cross and flowers?

TV....I have never understood these roadside memorials either. Why would anyone want to memorialize the place someone died. I guess different strokes for different folks.

different strokes for different folks if that pun was not intended it should have beenLaughing
Reply
#6
(09-03-2011, 09:28 PM)tvguy Wrote:
(09-03-2011, 09:06 PM)Snowlover Wrote:
(09-03-2011, 09:01 PM)tvguy Wrote:
(09-03-2011, 06:29 PM)isabella72 Wrote: I understand the memorial, but really? having 100 people show up alongside the highway for this event was a stupid idea..and look what happened

I agree but I don't understand the memorial. what's wrong with having memorials at cemeteries where the body is placed?
Why on earth is the place where people actually die the place to put a cross and flowers?

TV....I have never understood these roadside memorials either. Why would anyone want to memorialize the place someone died. I guess different strokes for different folks.

different strokes for different folks if that pun was not intended it should have beenLaughing

EmbarrassedEmbarrassed It wasn't intended but maybe I should clam it? Laughing
Reply
#7
These ditch shrines usually mark the passing of a drunk (And, almost never a pothead).
Reply
#8
(09-03-2011, 09:01 PM)tvguy Wrote:
(09-03-2011, 06:29 PM)isabella72 Wrote: I understand the memorial, but really? having 100 people show up alongside the highway for this event was a stupid idea..and look what happened

I agree but I don't understand the memorial. what's wrong with having memorials at cemeteries where the body is placed?
Why on earth is the place where people actually die the place to put a cross and flowers?

Some cultures believe the soul remains where it left the body until judgment day.
Thus the flowers are brought to the place of death.
Reply
#9
(09-03-2011, 05:01 PM)PonderThis Wrote: "No one can put up a memorial on the side of a highway unless state law allows it," Thompson said. "The legislature created a law specifically for law enforcement, and this was the first sign."

"Anything that distracts you from driving can be dangerous," Thompson said. "That said, every agency has to follow the law. That's what we did. We are not against this memorial at all. One of our chief executives was at the ceremony. Our sympathies are with the officers."

So, once again, if one is involved in "law enforcement", one can create a "law" which will allow you to do things that we poor little insignificant ordinary "civilians" cannot do.

While I empathize with the families of the officers who were killed while performing their duties, the stratification of "us" (law enforcement) vs. "them" (ordinary "civilians") is inexcusable. Just one more example of how they believe that, because they are the "law", they can exempt themselves from said law.

Reply
#10
(09-04-2011, 07:50 AM)chuck white Wrote:
(09-03-2011, 09:01 PM)tvguy Wrote:
(09-03-2011, 06:29 PM)isabella72 Wrote: I understand the memorial, but really? having 100 people show up alongside the highway for this event was a stupid idea..and look what happened

I agree but I don't understand the memorial. what's wrong with having memorials at cemeteries where the body is placed?
Why on earth is the place where people actually die the place to put a cross and flowers?

Some cultures believe the soul remains where it left the body until judgment day.
Thus the flowers are brought to the place of death.

Some cultures think they need to live naked with a gourd tied to their Johnson or jump from an 80 foot stick built scaffold with a grape vine tied to their foot. Or run naked across the backs of a bunch of cows.Razz

I think grief stricken people are just lost as to what they should do.

Reply
#11
(09-04-2011, 09:40 AM)Smithcat Wrote:
(09-03-2011, 05:01 PM)PonderThis Wrote: "No one can put up a memorial on the side of a highway unless state law allows it," Thompson said. "The legislature created a law specifically for law enforcement, and this was the first sign."

"Anything that distracts you from driving can be dangerous," Thompson said. "That said, every agency has to follow the law. That's what we did. We are not against this memorial at all. One of our chief executives was at the ceremony. Our sympathies are with the officers."

So, once again, if one is involved in "law enforcement", one can create a "law" which will allow you to do things that we poor little insignificant ordinary "civilians" cannot do.

While I empathize with the families of the officers who were killed while performing their duties, the stratification of "us" (law enforcement) vs. "them" (ordinary "civilians") is inexcusable. Just one more example of how they believe that, because they are the "law", they can exempt themselves from said law.

So "once again"? if you are going to make the case that this is an ongoing problem why don't you mention all these other times the police make laws just for them?
Reply
#12
Here's a little memorial for the sheriff, who got a little rough with his fifteen year old squeeze. How far is he into his six year and eleven month sentence?
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)